Pally says;

"What you fail to realize (probably purposefully) is that I'm not the one with the problem, therefore there is no need to even attempt to dissect my posts."

The implication is that there is a need, or at least a justification, to dissect posts of someone who has a problem. He consistantly tries to dissect the posts of others, so there really isn't much of a question that he believes this and acts on it. Therefore a strong case should be made to qualify and illustrate the fact that Pally has a problem in order to justify to him that parsing his posts is a reasonable action.

He goes on to add;

"There's a simple solution to this whole matter. Stop with the insults, innuendoes, exaggerations, etc. & everything malicious & you won't hear a peep out of me."

That's an incredibly controlling statement, filled with inaccuracies about the actual criteria that he's been using to act assaultive, bullying, rude and self-aggrandising. It also misstates the goal of not wanting to hear a peep out of him. Personally I want people like him to keep exposing their true nature. It's a wonderful object lesson for the rest of us about what happens when you try a little too often and a little too loudly to be a bully and a braggart; when you try to get your kicks out of shouting down and cowing those who point out truths that you don't wish to hear.

Besides that, he's fun to play with. Anyone with as much malice as he's constantly displayed, and who uses it to support and enhance tha malice of a greater and more effective bully in order to attain some kind of reflected glory, is a joy to expose. Over and over and over again.

Drop it? He clearly craves the attention. Why would we possibly be so cruel as to take it away from him? I personally promise that I won't do this to him.

"Clearly"? Only if you consider the fact that you see through fogged glasses.
Fret not. You've already justified yourself in the eyes of your fellow detractors, so you're now free & clear to continue your tirade. Whatever helps you sleep at night.
It's amazing how unoriginal you are becoming, using almost the exact same words I have been using in describing you & your fellow detractors posting proclivities.
It must irk your buddies that they must feel they cannot point out these faults of yours "publicly", and thus stain your "reputation". Little do they (and you) realize that it's already way past that.
You have already revealed your agenda in other posts, but I guess it's good thing (for you) that's you've pretty much come out of the closet, so to speak, and have now admitted your obsession.
Of course, the really strange part (to anyone of sound mind) is that your fellow detractors will see this as a good thing.
This also will help you justify (to yourself) your continued yammerings.
Carry on!

When I use the words that you've inappropriately used to describe me and the vast majority of others that disagree with you, it's a matter of pointing out that in your frenzy to attack us you inadvertantly have done little other than to describe your own actions. I don't doubt that irony is lost on you, but it doesn't make it any less ironic.

You can, and probably will, claim superiority and victory in every post you sling my way but I don't see any support for your position from anyone. You may think that I'm preaching to the choir, but it's pretty evident that you're just preaching to yourself and supplying your own applause and accolades.

Your recent posts can pretty much be boiled down to "I'm right and you're blind and stupid" without every using any kind of justification beyond your ability to type the words. Occasionally you throw in a snarky comment and pretend it's a proof, but you haven't ever capably used logic to prove a point. You pretend to speak for those of sound mind, Pally, but no one of sound mind or otherwise seems to be backing you up or supporting your assertions. Heck, you even pretend to speak for those who agree with me but are afraid to publicly stain my reputation, as though this were a timid bunch I've somehow cowed into submission but you'll speak for them despite their fears. Your support for this? Mind reading! I guess that must mean that you've failed not only as a logistician, but as a communicator as well, except for those supportive telepathic voices from the folks "pretending" to support what I say telling you what a good job you've done.

You are one big ol' contradiction and I'm glad to have the opportunity to point you out. Thank you.

Inappropriately? Hardly that. Once again, for the obstinate, whenever one is able to debate about certain subjects in a mature & well-though out manner (no insults & obvious malicious intentions) then I say nary a word that any sane individual should take as derogatory.
Then there are those that CHOOSE to get defensive. Wackiness.
It's cool that you have apparently found an outlet for your frustrations but, as they say, you're barking up the wrong tree.

Paranoia will get you nowhere.

More lies, insults and innuendo.
Internet Psychoanalytical failure #462 & counting...

Quote:

(no insults & obvious malicious intentions)

Please don't be obtuse on purpose.

Quote:

then I say nary a word that

More lies and exaggerations. Nice try. Thanks for playing!

Quote:

any sane individual should take as derogatory.

Expecting logical discourse from most detractors is also wishful thinking. Go figure.

Quote:

Then there are those that CHOOSE to get defensive. Wackiness.

Jumping to conclusions? Typical detractor tactics.

Quote:

It's cool that you have apparently found an outlet for your frustrations but, as they say,

Wishful thinking from the peanut gallery.

Quote:

you're barking up the wrong tree.

Gee, thanks for the advice. I'll keep in mind to watch for your posts in the future to look for appropriate replies to predictable responses.

When one chooses to be defensive, one defends choice.

Guys, guys. Don't you realize that Pally was just speaking for you because you were too intimidated that I might say something rude to you.

You're just being detractors and typing those things because you know Pally would never lash out at you, and that my wrath has detractors trembling from Announcements all the way to the gutters.

(But they are quite funny.)

When your wrath causes your detractors to tremble, their trembling detracts from your wrath.

I know you don't like to actually answer questions Paul (might you have a future in politics?), but I'm wondering if you have ever directed any of your family, friends, or anyone to check out any of these shenanigans - and if not, why not? Also, can you explain why your positions, if they can be called such, garner no agreement?

I do not mean to imply that agreement equals truth, falsity, good or bad. I'm genuinely curious.

(In response to the last Geedis post)

That makes no sense. Now you've got it down perfectly.