Dan Holloway wrote: The link would have been more than sufficient, and would have provided a more jurisprudent representation of what was said.
Dan you nitwit, the "link" is still there. I even made a hyperlink
for you. http://www.tcj.com/messboard/ubb/Forum5/HTML/000048.html
Anyone doubting the jurisprudence
of this thread...please see the original for yourselves.
Dan Holloway (again): "P.S.
Robert, the selections you chose present the most biased representation of that thread I can imagine. I'm not saying that they're inaccurate, but it's basically the equivalent of selecting a handful of verses from the Bible to create arguments for racism, sexual intolerance, etc."
Huh?? Dan, I know you view Kim as your prophet but this is ridiculous. You're over your head. Please give up. The only bias expressed is in your own words. I've reposted the thread in almost the exact order in which the comments were originally posted. I only left out things irrelevant to the argument.
Dan Holloway said: "I can't say I agree with Robert Young on much of anything, but at least he's not running around inventing lawyers and threatening to sue people. "
That's where you're dead wrong. I'm having my lawyer Jackie Childs review Kim's slanderous remarks against me at this very moment. I expect before the week is out I'll not only be calling the shots at TCJ (you're fired Milo!) but I'll also own all the Stewie merchandise in the Fantagraphics warehouse.