sorry i should have read the small print freedom of speech only if you dont have a conflicting opinion

That must be it.

It can't have anything to do with the fact that your right to say whatever you want doesn't extend to busting onto private property (such as, say, a message board,) disobeying the host's rules, and not leaving when you've been thrown out.

It can't mean that freedom of speech does not guarantee that anyone has to care what you say.

as far as im concerned i not broken the rules because what ive said especially about you has turned out to be true so far and perhaps you could explain how this is private property i would like to hear your explaination for this

His spelling skills and non-use of punctuation certainly haven't changed, have they?

It is not owned by the public. It is owned by Rick Veitch and Steve Conley.

Pretty simple, actually.

Before spouting off about who's a "daft prick," you might want to make sure you understand what you're responding to.

Ah, SIMPLICITY! No WONDER it escaped him!

and your lack of imagination hasnt either has it come on my argument must have plenty of holes in it why dont you attack that instead of going down the tired and predictable route of slagging my punctuation. I take it whenever you see poor punctuation you have a wee laugh to yourself "aha no full stop i can destroy this man completely" get a grip loser

anyone with a computer can access it and the whole point of the internet is publis access to information so i guess it would be private property if you didnt own or have access to a computer otherwise it is a public forum

Which somehow implies that anyone with a computer owns it?

Anyone can walk into an office building off the street. It doesn't mean they own that, either.

robo, Why in the WORLD would I seriously attempt to argue with the internet equivalent of radio static? :p