 |

|
|
|
|
#554259 - 08/03/09 05:52 PM
Re: Q for JB
[Re: Budman]
|
Member
Registered: 06/22/01
Posts: 12277
|
Holy crap really? That's pretty low. I mean what's next, that's almost as bad as actually posting under the people's names.
Paul tell me this wasn't so!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#554261 - 08/03/09 05:55 PM
Re: Q for JB
[Re: Joe Lee]
|
Member
Registered: 12/13/01
Posts: 1859
Loc: Penfield, Ny USA
|
Oh, it's true.
_________________________
"God you are a Genius Budman." --Alexander Ness "I know." --Budman
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#554290 - 08/03/09 07:45 PM
Re: Q for JB
[Re: Budman]
|
Member
Registered: 07/09/09
Posts: 150
Loc: CA by way of OH
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#554359 - 08/04/09 11:11 AM
Re: Q for JB
[Re: Joe Lee]
|
Member
Registered: 07/22/01
Posts: 4593
Loc: Sparks, Nevada, United States
|
Holy crap really? That's pretty low. I mean what's next, that's almost as bad as actually posting under the people's names.
Paul tell me this wasn't so! It wasn't. This "catastrophe" occurred back in 2004 & it was one of JB's moderators who made an error in judgment by messing with the preference settings of many of the sites members. I can't recall EXACTLY what happened, but I do recall that it had something to do with the "ignore function". Some started crying about their "freedom of speech" being violated and other such nonsense. It was yet another instance that was blown way out of proportion.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#554365 - 08/04/09 12:53 PM
Re: Q for JB
[Re: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.]
|
Member
Registered: 10/31/03
Posts: 1338
Loc: Airdrie, Scotland
|
Holy crap really? That's pretty low. I mean what's next, that's almost as bad as actually posting under the people's names.
Paul tell me this wasn't so! It wasn't. This "catastrophe" occurred back in 2004 & it was one of JB's moderators who made an error in judgment by messing with the preference settings of many of the sites members. I can't recall EXACTLY what happened, but I do recall that it had something to do with the "ignore function". Some started crying about their "freedom of speech" being violated and other such nonsense. It was yet another instance that was blown way out of proportion. I'm pretty sure it was JB personally who did it. Anyway, it's his board so he can do what he likes.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#554369 - 08/04/09 01:33 PM
Re: Q for JB
[Re: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.]
|
Junior member
Registered: 08/04/09
Posts: 22
|
Not quite what happened, Paul. Glenn Watson was a guy who joined the Byrne board around 2004 and started nailing Byrne on some of the bullshit he had been spewing without challenge. In particular, Glenn got into a discussion with Byrne over who owned Rog 2000. During that discussion, Byrne got caught in a lie and cravenly tried to stealth edit his post to make it look like Glenn was wrong. Byrne got mad because Glenn wasn't going to let it go after catching him dead to rights and since Byrne didn't want to ban Glenn Watson because "he wanted it too bad" he and the guy who manages his site cooked up the idea to put Glenn on everyone's ignore list since using Byrne's own words in context against him is a no-no over there.
People there weren't "crying" over free speech. They were pissed that someone messed with their settings without their consent. Dave Pruitt got the blame for what happened by that fat fuck Matt Hawes because Hawes didn't want to believe Byrne would do something so scummy and he didn't like Pruitt anyway. And Byrne being the classy guy we all know so well, came up with some lame excuse a few days after everyone was going berserk and pointing the finger at the wrong person. He called it a "glitch" and had no problem leaving Pruitt out there to take the blame.
Edited by markom (08/04/09 03:22 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#554382 - 08/04/09 03:01 PM
Re: Q for JB
[Re: markom]
|
Member
Registered: 11/13/08
Posts: 1176
Loc: Chicago, Illinois
|
Not quite what happened, Paul. Glenn Watson was a guy who joined the Byrne board around 2004 and started nailing Byrne on some of the bullshit he had been spewing without challenge. In particular, Glenn got into a discussion with Byrne over who owned Rog 2000. I hadn't heard this one....WHO owns Rog 2000, Charlton? ..
Edited by Kirth (08/04/09 03:02 PM)
_________________________
It does not have to be that way. You do not have to act that way. You are hurting people. Please stop.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#554383 - 08/04/09 03:21 PM
Re: Q for JB
[Re: Kirth]
|
Junior member
Registered: 08/04/09
Posts: 22
|
Not quite what happened, Paul. Glenn Watson was a guy who joined the Byrne board around 2004 and started nailing Byrne on some of the bullshit he had been spewing without challenge. In particular, Glenn got into a discussion with Byrne over who owned Rog 2000. I hadn't heard this one....WHO owns Rog 2000, Charlton? .. Byrne now claims he owns Rog 2000.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#554387 - 08/04/09 03:31 PM
Re: Q for JB
[Re: markom]
|
Member
Registered: 05/08/00
Posts: 6909
|
I believe the oversized edition Pacific published reprinting the E-Man ROG-2000 backups said in the indicia that the character was copyright Byrne and the reprinted material was copyright Charlton. I'd have to dig it out again to be sure.
_________________________
"The trouble with being a ghost writer or artist is that you must remain anonymous without credit. If one wants the credit, one has to cease being a ghost and become a leader or innovator." — Bob Kane
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |