Page 202 of 398 < 1 2 ... 200 201 202 203 204 ... 397 398 >
Topic Options
#577835 - 09/22/10 07:20 AM Re: Q for JB [Re: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.]
Troy Lightbourne Offline
Member

Registered: 05/03/10
Posts: 543
Originally Posted By: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.
Originally Posted By: Troy Lightbourne
I've seen his work when his heart really isn't in it...


Name each & every time ...


Oh brother...


I've often said that Byrne's heart only lies with the Stan Lee and Jack Kirby creations he read as a kid and that makes a huge difference in his work. His absolutely best stuff was on his X-Men run with Claremont and then his FF run. His Hulk was looking promising but then he threw a tantrum and quit before he could hit any real notable heights. His DC stuff was flat and pedestrian. His Superman read like two years of filler stories (and then he threw a tantrum and quit!) Don't even bother with his later DC stuff like Doom Patrol and Lab Rats. The only real exception to this was Alpha Flight which was outstanding but it was, as he's often said himself, a book he never had any real affection for ...and they were his own creations!

A casual scan of those commissions will back this up. The early Marvel characters will usually look good. The DC stuff... yeesh! Occasionally there are exceptions here too. A recent piece featuring the Red Circle characters looked pretty good... but then there was that Supergirl from a few pages back... Ouch!
_________________________
"...M*****..." ---John Byrne, a sixty year old man unwilling to refer to Marvel Comics by their proper name because they'd canceled his book.

Top
#577836 - 09/22/10 09:38 AM Re: Q for JB [Re: Troy Lightbourne]
Budman Offline
Member

Registered: 12/13/01
Posts: 1859
Loc: Penfield, Ny USA
Don't forget about the 90lb milksop Clark Kent
_________________________
"God you are a Genius Budman." --Alexander Ness
"I know." --Budman

Top
#577851 - 09/22/10 01:50 PM Re: Q for JB [Re: Troy Lightbourne]
Paul W. Sondersted, Jr. Offline
Member

Registered: 07/22/01
Posts: 4593
Loc: Sparks, Nevada, United States
Originally Posted By: Troy Lightbourne
Originally Posted By: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.
Originally Posted By: Troy Lightbourne
I've seen his work when his heart really isn't in it...


Name each & every time ...


Oh brother...


Testify!

Originally Posted By: Troy Lightbourne
I've often said that Byrne's heart only lies with the Stan Lee and Jack Kirby creations he read as a kid and that makes a huge difference in his work.


Since almost every GREAT Marvel character was created by Stan Lee and/or Jack Kirby, this is something that is hard to avoid, isn't it?

Originally Posted By: Troy Lightbourne
His absolutely best stuff was on his X-Men run with Claremont and then his FF run. His Hulk was looking promising but then he threw a tantrum and quit before he could hit any real notable heights.


threw a tantrum?

Originally Posted By: Troy Lightbourne
His DC stuff was flat and pedestrian. His Superman read like two years of filler stories (and then he threw a tantrum and quit!)


threw a tantrum?

Originally Posted By: Troy Lightbourne
Don't even bother with his later DC stuff like Doom Patrol and Lab Rats.


Too late! Read them & enjoyed them. Not his best work, but entertaining just the same.

Originally Posted By: Troy Lightbourne
The only real exception to this was Alpha Flight which was outstanding but it was, as he's often said himself, a book he never had any real affection for ...and they were his own creations!


So his heart wasn't in a project that you seem to consider outstanding? Since this is only ONE exception, though, it shouldn't contradict your theory in any way, shape or form? Well it's YOUR game & YOUR rules, so it will make sense to YOU.

Originally Posted By: Troy Lightbourne
A casual scan of those commissions will back this up.


This is akin to a casual scan of a comic book or a novel or watching a movie preview or clip & then proclaiming you know everything you need to know about it.

Also, there are actual individuals who proclaim entire runs of comic books (not just JB's) as bad based only on an issue or two, or maybe more sometimes.

Idiocy at best...Ignorance at worst.

And just to save anyone from jumping the gun, there's absolutely nothing wrong whatsoever saying that a particular issue sucked, then choosing not to read any others.

Originally Posted By: Troy Lightbourne
The early Marvel characters will usually look good. The DC stuff... yeesh! Occasionally there are exceptions here too. A recent piece featuring the Red Circle characters looked pretty good... but then there was that Supergirl from a few pages back... Ouch!


There's bound to be a few less than exceptional pieces of work (and keep in mind that the context here is commissions) when you're talking about literally hundreds of images. The vast majority are very well done & the fans who paid for these commissions are usually very happy with the results (tangent off into assumptions & presumptions if you will, but don't expect any sort of reaction from me if you get wacky about it).

It is the height of arrogance & ignorance to try to see what sort of effort (or heart) went into creating any given piece. Like or dislike a piece, but don't presume that you have some sort of ability to send your astral self into JB's studio & witness his state of mind or attitude while working on any given piece (and this goes for any of his works).

Top
#577852 - 09/22/10 02:06 PM Re: Q for JB [Re: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.]
Ceci n'est pas une chaussette Offline
Member

Registered: 12/19/05
Posts: 2831
Originally Posted By: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.
It is the height of arrogance & ignorance to try to see what sort of effort (or heart) went into creating any given piece. Like or dislike a piece, but don't presume that you have some sort of ability to send your astral self into JB's studio & witness his state of mind or attitude while working on any given piece (and this goes for any of his works).


Now Paul hates mindreading again. This, of course, tends to go back and forth, depending on whether or not Paul is doing it at the time.
_________________________
"When one says 'Africa,' it refers to Africa in the Euro-colonized sense, not the damn bush country or whatever."
- Ed Gauthier, DCP

Top
#577853 - 09/22/10 03:08 PM Re: Q for JB [Re: Ceci n'est pas une chaussette]
Alexander Ness Offline
Member

Registered: 09/17/03
Posts: 3692
Loc: Minnesota
If is reading mine, he is able to see what I am thinking, ... MILKSHAKE!

Top
#577854 - 09/22/10 03:51 PM Re: Q for JB [Re: Alexander Ness]
Nordberg Offline
Member

Registered: 04/18/10
Posts: 50

Top
#577855 - 09/22/10 03:57 PM Re: Q for JB [Re: Nordberg]
Alexander Ness Offline
Member

Registered: 09/17/03
Posts: 3692
Loc: Minnesota

Top
#577856 - 09/22/10 05:59 PM Re: Q for JB [Re: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.]
Mike Keane Offline
Member

Registered: 01/01/10
Posts: 82
Originally Posted By: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.


Anywho, the bottom line (whew!), as I already stated, was that JB had mitigating circumstances as to why he decided to postpone Next Men & even though I disagree that the market was as bad as JB thought it was back then, I don't blame him for being paranoid after encountering the few instances of retailer idiocy that caused him to come to his decision.

In regards to Art Adams & his Monkeyman & O'Brien commitments, Legend was created to showcase creator-owned projects & that's why Art Adams was allowed to join that group. He promised to deliver Monkeyman & O'Brien & while there were a few appearances published, Art Adams ultimately decided to go with other projects. I certainly don't blame him for wanting to go where the easier money was to be made & perhaps he did most of those side projects for fun as well (I know they were certainly fun reads), in essence he turned his back on Legend & I don't imagine JB (& the other Legends) appreciated that very much (understatement in regards to JB).

Originally Posted By: Joe Lee
It sounds to me like Adams made a business decision, one book prioritized over his own creator owned work. Isn't that his call to make, not Byrne's? (But I'm just going from the info here, is there more to it?)


I agree that it was a very sound business decision to make. I think what happened was JB sets a very high bar for professionalism in this business & it's a mistake on his part to expect others to follow his lead. It shouldn't have come as a surprise really because prior to Art Adams joining Legend, he didn't exactly have a reputation for projects that lasted any longer than mini-series length (at most).



Paul,

Since Legend was a creator owned imprint what has it got to do with jb if Art Adams releases his book or not?

And Adams choosing to do paying work rather than creator owned is exactly the same as jb choosing to work for dc/marvel rather than do Next men or Rog 2000

Top
#577867 - 09/22/10 09:46 PM Re: Q for JB [Re: Mike Keane]
Paul W. Sondersted, Jr. Offline
Member

Registered: 07/22/01
Posts: 4593
Loc: Sparks, Nevada, United States
Originally Posted By: Mike Keane
Paul,

Since Legend was a creator owned imprint what has it got to do with jb if Art Adams releases his book or not?

And Adams choosing to do paying work rather than creator owned is exactly the same as jb choosing to work for dc/marvel rather than do Next men or Rog 2000


Art Adams apparently made a promise to the other Legends creators & apparently broke that promise. What promises did JB break to his fellow Legends creators? No one else has ever come forward from Legends to say JB never kept his commitments did they?

Art Adams never fell back on JB's excuse (with Next Men) to not publish Monkeyman & O'Brien due to perceived notions about the state of the industry did he? JB immediately found work, while Art Adams projects came out sporadically...at best. This pretty much proves who has the capability to commit & who doesn't for whatever reasons.

Top
#577874 - 09/23/10 08:26 AM Re: Q for JB [Re: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.]
Mike Keane Offline
Member

Registered: 01/01/10
Posts: 82
Originally Posted By: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.
Originally Posted By: Mike Keane
Paul,

Since Legend was a creator owned imprint what has it got to do with jb if Art Adams releases his book or not?

And Adams choosing to do paying work rather than creator owned is exactly the same as jb choosing to work for dc/marvel rather than do Next men or Rog 2000


Art Adams apparently made a promise to the other Legends creators & apparently broke that promise. What promises did JB break to his fellow Legends creators? No one else has ever come forward from Legends to say JB never kept his commitments did they?

Art Adams never fell back on JB's excuse (with Next Men) to not publish Monkeyman & O'Brien due to perceived notions about the state of the industry did he? JB immediately found work, while Art Adams projects came out sporadically...at best. This pretty much proves who has the capability to commit & who doesn't for whatever reasons.


Paul.

Why should Adams have to "fall back" on any excuse, Monkeyman was no longer published (for whatever reason) as was Next men (again for whatever reason) they both made a decision to not publish the books,and therefore both (in your terms) let down the other creators of the legend imprint, the reason is irrelevant.

Although since it was a creator owned imprint I fail to se how either of them let anyone else down.

Also the idea that jb found work immediately while adams did not is also irrelevant, there is more to being a professional than just producing a lot of work.

Adams did whatever work he thought he needed to do to pay his way, as did JB just because jb did more does not make adams unprofessional.

As an addendum.

JB jas (by his own admission) jumped ship on many titles because he did not like the way he was treated (see the Superman returns movie situation)

Top
Page 202 of 398 < 1 2 ... 200 201 202 203 204 ... 397 398 >


Moderator:  Rick Veitch, Steve Conley