 |
|
|
|
|
#574051 - 07/01/10 04:39 PM
Re: Q for JB
[Re: Alexander Ness]
|
Member
Registered: 04/18/10
Posts: 50
|
Q for JB: is it possible that you are attempting delete the whole fooking world, one pissed off, insulted, and randomly banned forum member at a time?
It's like a performance art project, perhaps, and kind of genius when you think about it: Byrne has created his own little sub-universe, of which the sole purpose is to eventually eliminate everyone in the world who disagrees with him or in anyway displeases him. Sometimes he speeds up the process by deliberately trolling board members to the point where they have no choice but to disagree and become eliminated.
On the other hand, though, some of his latest commissions have been of fairly high quality. So there's that.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#574052 - 07/01/10 04:44 PM
Re: Q for JB
[Re: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.]
|
Member
Registered: 10/31/03
Posts: 1338
Loc: Airdrie, Scotland
|
Fireworks?
It looks like intellectual discussion.
What fireworks are you seeing? It's a one sided intellectual discussion - Byrne doesn't know what he's talking about and is in "I've read a book" mode but doesn't understand the subject. A cursory check of the subject shows that Shakespeare wrote Shakespeare. End of.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#574055 - 07/01/10 06:52 PM
Re: Q for JB
[Re: Nordberg]
|
Member
Registered: 09/17/03
Posts: 3692
Loc: Minnesota
|
I was being obtuse I guess, I think Byrne is very attached to the sanctity of his domain, and thereby takes issue with disagreers. Whereas I am in a world that by nature vehemently disagrees with me, so maybe I should delete them, or failing that, me. Q for JB: is it possible that you are attempting delete the whole fooking world, one pissed off, insulted, and randomly banned forum member at a time?
It's like a performance art project, perhaps, and kind of genius when you think about it: Byrne has created his own little sub-universe, of which the sole purpose is to eventually eliminate everyone in the world who disagrees with him or in anyway displeases him. Sometimes he speeds up the process by deliberately trolling board members to the point where they have no choice but to disagree and become eliminated.
On the other hand, though, some of his latest commissions have been of fairly high quality. So there's that.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#574056 - 07/01/10 07:19 PM
Re: Q for JB
[Re: Alexander Ness]
|
Member
Registered: 12/13/01
Posts: 1859
Loc: Penfield, Ny USA
|
It's like he's playing god over there. Pretty ironic considering he 's Atheist
_________________________
"God you are a Genius Budman." --Alexander Ness
"I know." --Budman
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#574057 - 07/01/10 07:52 PM
Re: Q for JB
[Re: Budman]
|
Member
Registered: 09/17/03
Posts: 3692
Loc: Minnesota
|
It's like he's playing god over there. Pretty ironic considering he 's Atheist so true, but I think more Emperor than God. Who are you to tell him he is not only nude but has a small winky?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#574058 - 07/01/10 07:56 PM
Re: Q for JB
[Re: Alexander Ness]
|
Member
Registered: 04/18/10
Posts: 50
|
I was being obtuse I guess, I think Byrne is very attached to the sanctity of his domain, and thereby takes issue with disagreers. Whereas I am in a world that by nature vehemently disagrees with me, so maybe I should delete them, or failing that, me. Not obtuse, I was just supposing that Byrne is actually pretty much in the same boat you are but has taken a unique approach to solving the problem by creating a "world" in which he can, in fact delete anyone who vehemently disagrees with him. Genius!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#574059 - 07/01/10 08:01 PM
Re: Q for JB
[Re: Budman]
|
Member
Registered: 05/08/00
Posts: 6909
|
It's like he's playing god over there. Pretty ironic considering he 's Atheist Has anyone asked him if he thinks time is a linear concept?
_________________________
"The trouble with being a ghost writer or artist is that you must remain anonymous without credit.
If one wants the credit, one has to cease being a ghost and become a leader or innovator." — Bob Kane
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#574066 - 07/02/10 07:44 PM
Re: Q for JB
[Re: shjonescrk]
|
Member
Registered: 07/22/01
Posts: 4593
Loc: Sparks, Nevada, United States
|
Fireworks?
It looks like intellectual discussion.
What fireworks are you seeing? It's a one sided intellectual discussion - Byrne doesn't know what he's talking about and is in "I've read a book" mode but doesn't understand the subject. A cursory check of the subject shows that Shakespeare wrote Shakespeare. End of. I was responding to the link regarding the atheist discussion...not the Shakespeare discussion. Still, in what way does JB not know what he's talking about in regards to Shakespeare?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#574067 - 07/02/10 07:45 PM
Re: Q for JB
[Re: Nordberg]
|
Member
Registered: 07/22/01
Posts: 4593
Loc: Sparks, Nevada, United States
|
I was being obtuse I guess, I think Byrne is very attached to the sanctity of his domain, and thereby takes issue with disagreers. Whereas I am in a world that by nature vehemently disagrees with me, so maybe I should delete them, or failing that, me. Not obtuse, I was just supposing that Byrne is actually pretty much in the same boat you are but has taken a unique approach to solving the problem by creating a "world" in which he can, in fact delete anyone who vehemently disagrees with him. Genius! Is this, in fact, happening in the thread in question? Has JB deleted someone for disagreeing with him?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#574076 - 07/03/10 03:18 AM
Re: Q for JB
[Re: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.]
|
Member
Registered: 10/31/03
Posts: 1338
Loc: Airdrie, Scotland
|
Fireworks?
It looks like intellectual discussion.
What fireworks are you seeing? It's a one sided intellectual discussion - Byrne doesn't know what he's talking about and is in "I've read a book" mode but doesn't understand the subject. A cursory check of the subject shows that Shakespeare wrote Shakespeare. End of. I was responding to the link regarding the atheist discussion...not the Shakespeare discussion. Still, in what way does JB not know what he's talking about in regards to Shakespeare? Read the thread.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous Topic
Index