You say BushSr should be held at least partially responsible for the slaughter of the Kurds. Mmmm-kay.

So why did you credit Obama with fuelling revolution in Syria if he doesn't have any responsibility for the ongoing revolution in Syria? And why did you credit his unerring leadership with killing Qaddaffi if he doesn't have anything else to do with Libya and it wasn't our operation? Are you just spouting nonsense for the sake of spouting nonsense?

Gadhafi's death is what fueled an uprising in Syria, not the U.S.'s support role in the operation that killed him. Although we did play a role.

I did not say anything about President Obama's "unerring leadership," but rather his unerring *judgment* in honoring the U.S.'s obligation to our NATO allies, despite all the crying coming from the Republicans.


If you wish to draw a contorted line connecting the President to anything bad going on anywhere in the world, please go right ahead and try. My suggestion would be you take some remedial course in reading comprehension first, however.



So you say BushSr is to blame for the slaughter of the Kurds, eh?