AGAIN, how am I empathizing?
And then you go off on a paragraph about how he likely felt.
My point had nothing to do with the merits of the argument itself.
Neither does mine. I'm pointing out that he is a thief and a liar, and yet you care about how he feels.
Feelings had nothing to do with the merits of your argument. Not even saying you shouldn't have made it. This place is all about free speech, with little or no interference, and it should be, as long as the powers that be will allow us that freedom.
It doesn't mean that I can't say that it's also likely to keep away the pros, not saying its good or bad just part of the package.
Does anyone else get the distinction? Is there a better way to explain it, I've tried half a dozen time, am I not doing it that well or is he being thick?