Page 219 of 398 < 1 2 ... 217 218 219 220 221 ... 397 398 >
Topic Options
#578411 - 10/13/10 04:01 AM Re: Q for JB [Re: Allen Montgomery]
shjonescrk Offline
Member

Registered: 10/31/03
Posts: 1340
Loc: Airdrie, Scotland
For me, the decline set in when Sir Arthur Conan Doyle brought back Sherlock Holmes.

Top
#578412 - 10/13/10 05:39 AM Re: Q for JB [Re: shjonescrk]
Alexander Ness Offline
Member

Registered: 09/17/03
Posts: 3692
Loc: Minnesota
Don't forget when Caveman Ogg crushed the skull of Caveman Zunk and thought, I wonder if he come back from dead?

Top
#578413 - 10/13/10 07:21 AM Re: Q for JB [Re: Lawson]
Paul W. Sondersted, Jr. Offline
Member

Registered: 07/22/01
Posts: 4593
Loc: Sparks, Nevada, United States
Originally Posted By: Lawson
I don't know what Byrne had to do with Jean Grey's return, if anything. I thought that happened in X-FACTOR no. 1, which was produced by other people. I'm coming late to that argument. I was just discussing the merits of bringing her back from the dead at all.


Some sort of cocoon was found in an issue of Avengers (can't recall the issue number). The cocoon was brought to FF headquarters (in an issue of FF) & when it was opened there, inside was the REAL Jean Grey. These issues led into the first issue of X-Factor.

Apparently when there was some sort of discussion regarding bring the original X-Men back together, they ran into a dead end because Jean Grey was dead. JB came up with a way to bring her back.

Top
#578414 - 10/13/10 07:21 AM Re: Q for JB [Re: Lawson]
Paul W. Sondersted, Jr. Offline
Member

Registered: 07/22/01
Posts: 4593
Loc: Sparks, Nevada, United States
Originally Posted By: Lawson
Incidentally, a buddy recently sold me a big stack of comics -- the complete John Byrne run on MARVEL TEAM-UP and MARVEL TWO IN ONE -- that everyone said was so good. I got 'em for, like, 50 cents each. He cut me quite a deal.

I'll read them soon and let Paul and everyone know what I think.


What a great find. Some neat stuff there. Congratulations.

Top
#578415 - 10/13/10 07:28 AM Re: Q for JB [Re: Allen Montgomery]
Paul W. Sondersted, Jr. Offline
Member

Registered: 07/22/01
Posts: 4593
Loc: Sparks, Nevada, United States
Originally Posted By: Allen Montgomery
Originally Posted By: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.
Before Jean Grey's return, there was Elektra, IIRC.

Thank you for your agreeance, as that is my point exactly. It had already been done, so this was nothing new. Besides the pseudo-resurrection of Jean as Maddy Prior.


Great art by Paul Smith in those issues of X-Men in which Madelyne Pryor first appeared. Didn't like that part of the story all that much, though.

In any case, I don't think anyone was claiming that bringing characters back from the dead in comics was anything new.

Originally Posted By: Allen Montgomery
Like I said, Jean Grey's return was the tipping point when mainstream comics ran out of new ideas. And Byrne had a major hand in that.


As I already showed, this so-called tipping point, is anything BUT...at least in regards to JB having a major hand in it.

Top
#578416 - 10/13/10 07:29 AM Re: Q for JB [Re: Alexander Ness]
Paul W. Sondersted, Jr. Offline
Member

Registered: 07/22/01
Posts: 4593
Loc: Sparks, Nevada, United States
Originally Posted By: Alexander Ness
Don't forget when Caveman Ogg crushed the skull of Caveman Zunk and thought, I wonder if he come back from dead?


So! It's all Caveman Ogg's fault! I hope they ban him from attending all comic book conventions!

Top
#578417 - 10/13/10 08:25 AM Re: Q for JB [Re: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.]
Allen Montgomery Offline
Member

Registered: 05/08/00
Posts: 6915
Originally Posted By: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.
As I already showed, this so-called tipping point, is anything BUT...at least in regards to JB having a major hand in it.


Originally Posted By: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.
JB came up with a way to bring her back.
_________________________
"The trouble with being a ghost writer or artist is that you must remain anonymous without credit.
If one wants the credit, one has to cease being a ghost and become a leader or innovator."
— Bob Kane

Top
#578418 - 10/13/10 08:25 AM Re: Q for JB [Re: Allen Montgomery]
shjonescrk Offline
Member

Registered: 10/31/03
Posts: 1340
Loc: Airdrie, Scotland
I was never happy that Jean Grey was brought back. It undermined one of the best superheroes stories ever. I can't say I ever regarded it as a tipping point but clearly, it does represent an important step in the direction of which comics have become.

Unlike, say Captain America's death, Jean Grey was alway really dead. No one acted as if she was coming back and this was just a stunt. However, I am not unhappy with the Cap story as Brubaker was obviously setting it up to bring him back from the get go. So bringing back Elektra, Norman Osborne and Jean Grey are bad as they were really dead whereas bringing back Cap is not bad.

Top
#578425 - 10/13/10 11:55 AM Re: Q for JB [Re: Allen Montgomery]
Paul W. Sondersted, Jr. Offline
Member

Registered: 07/22/01
Posts: 4593
Loc: Sparks, Nevada, United States
Originally Posted By: Allen Montgomery
Originally Posted By: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.
As I already showed, this so-called tipping point, is anything BUT...at least in regards to JB having a major hand in it.


Originally Posted By: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.
JB came up with a way to bring her back.



And how many years after he wrote that story did any other major returns from the dead occur?

JB didn't set a precedent when he was allowed to bring Jean Grey back. There wasn't an immediate barrage of such stories that were inspired by JB were there? Does anyone REALLY think that someone decided to write a story in which a character was returned from the dead & they thought...It worked for JB. And if they did, it took 6 years for Marvel to allow another such story to be told (and that was ALSO by JB). Six years to tip a point, so to speak? 1 + 1 = It's JB's fault. Weird math.

It seems like something snapped after 2003 & JB had nothing to do with this trend-setting storytelling device becoming so popular.

Just because you may not have enjoyed Jean Grey's return doesn't mean blame should be placed on that story or it's writer(s) for what, in the end, was not a very original storytelling device anyway (And no, this does not indicate that I agree that the story was bad in any way, shape or form).

I can see WHY certain individuals around here WANT to place the blame at JB's feet, but the blame should really go with the PTB that decided to make such a trend (LONG after JB's stories were written, by the way).

More baloney for a few gullibles to chew on.

Top
#578429 - 10/13/10 01:12 PM Re: Q for JB [Re: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.]
Ceci n'est pas une chaussette Offline
Member

Registered: 12/19/05
Posts: 2831
Originally Posted By: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.
JB didn't set a precedent when he was allowed to bring Jean Grey back. There wasn't an immediate barrage of such stories that were inspired by JB were there? Does anyone REALLY think that someone decided to write a story in which a character was returned from the dead & they thought...It worked for JB. And if they did, it took 6 years for Marvel to allow another such story to be told (and that was ALSO by JB). Six years to tip a point, so to speak? 1 + 1 = It's JB's fault. Weird math.


Originally Posted By: John Byrne
In another thread, I mentioned NYC Mayor Rudi Guiliani's "war" on so-called "quality of life" crimes. The graffiti vandals, the squeeqie guys, etc. The people who contributed to an overall decline in the day to day life in New York. Guiliani reasoned -- and was proven correct -- that looking the other way when these "small scale" crimes were being committed contributed to a general negative attitude toward and about the city.

There is, for me, a parallel in the use of these cutesy-poo, and usually disrespectful short-forms of the character's names. "Supes". "Bats". "Wolvie". "Maggie". They come from, and contribute to, a subtle and insidious mentality in fandom. That whole "Oh, I am so much superior to this foolish comic books I am reading! Please, don't judge me by this trash! I am better than that!" As Guiliani saw with the "quality of life" crimes, it becomes a cumulative effect, and when we throw in a few other factors, equally "small" taken on their own -- well, we end up with the mess the industry is in today, don't we?


Originally Posted By: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.
Just because you may not have enjoyed Jean Grey's return doesn't mean blame should be placed on that story or it's writer(s) for what, in the end, was not a very original storytelling device anyway (And no, this does not indicate that I agree that the story was bad in any way, shape or form).


Originally Posted By: John Byrne
"To tell a good story" has become a pretty standard excuse for the excesses of most writers. The implication is twofold -- first, that no other "story" could be told that is as good as the one in question, and second that any story can be told as long as it is "good".

I could write a damn good story about Superman going mad and destroying the world, or Batman and Robin finally coming out of the closet -- but what would be gained? These are classic examples of the characters being made to serve the story (and the writer) instead of the other way 'round.
_________________________
"When one says 'Africa,' it refers to Africa in the Euro-colonized sense, not the damn bush country or whatever."
- Ed Gauthier, DCP

Top
Page 219 of 398 < 1 2 ... 217 218 219 220 221 ... 397 398 >


Moderator:  Rick Veitch, Steve Conley