Yeah, their behavior is quite baffling.

Predictable troll is predictable.

This is the thread where you've attacked Cooke. This is the thread where you've used your own artwork to justify that attack. At least putting a link so people reading this thread can see your art is pretty standard for the internet, even for jackasses like you.

Mike

No, this is the thread where I point up the poor quality of Cooke's participation in the attack on Alan Moore.



Not in any way, shape or form is that assertion even remotely true.

Allen, your art isn't awful by amateur standards. It doesn't look like something from a 6 year old with a crayon. If some young kid took it to a convention for an evaluation, the pro probably wouldn't laugh in his face.

But by professional artist standards? Real artist standards? Compared to the efforts of Cooke? Your art is fairly poor. I can see why you felt confident in boasting that no one can see any artistic influences in your work. Your technique is too crude to show any influences. Even that Byrne-clone who did Freak Force 20 years ago for Image was a superior artist to you because even such a slavish imitation required far more talent and skill than your work shows.

And yes, I'm just ignoring the irony overload of Allen calling anyone else a predictable troll.

Mike

Can I get a ruling here? Does anyone think Allen calling Cooke a "piece of shit" does not qualify as an attack? Does anyone think he's being at all reasonable in pretending that he didn't refer to the nature of his own art to justify his attack? Anyone? Bueller?

Mike

Even I have explicitly said that is an intentional insult.



Please point to where I have ever compared my work to Cooke's.

What was the purpose of YOU bringing up YOUR artwork in this thread if there was not some connection to your adolescent ragging on Cooke? Especially since you obviously aren't all that proud of it in the first place.

Mike

You forgot that he demands the person he's arguing with provide nonexistent evidence - artwork he won't show, a screenplay that's not written - to prove him wrong even though he never provides the slightest evidence that he's right.

Too bad (for you) that Larsen admitted to copying Byrne.