Lots of corpses in that part of the world thanks to that same Presidential judgement. But it bores you to hear any criticism or even to be reminded of "responsibility to protect." Sucks to be a Libyan, huh?

Maybe if they were talking about Joss Whedon movies you wouldn't be so bored.

You apparently ran out of porn.

What does that even mean?

So are you still thanking President Obama for fueling revolution in Syria?

In Syria, Romney would be on the other side making deals with the dictator, as BushJr was in Libya.

How would Romney convince the dictator not to stick with Iran and Russia?

Are you still thanking President Obama for fuelling revolution in Syria like you were for killing Qaddaffi?

Tell us what's wrong with supporting revolution in Syria.

Is that a yes or a no? And how would Romney convince Assad not to keep siding with Iran and Russia?

Tell us what's wrong with supporting revolution in Syria.

Months after you credited Obama with fuelling revolution in Syria is a little late to ask that question.

Yes or no, are you still crediting Obama with fuelling revolution in Syria?

And how, exactly, would Romney convince Assad that Iran and Russia aren't his best allies? You made both of those points. You could have said something intelligent instead and chose not to. How about addressing your own public proclamations for a change. Or at least stick with Joss Whedon movies.

I'm not asking a question. Tell us what is wrong with supporting revolution in Syria.



He wouldn't. He wouldn't be allowed to raise taxes and the debt ceiling has been made too controversial for us to put another optional war on the credit card. The only option left would be for Romney to become backroom allies with Iran, as BushJr did with Libya.