Page 4 of 5 < 1 2 3 4 5 >
Topic Options
#599219 - 07/05/12 01:32 PM Re: Len Wein: BEFORE WATCHMEN is Alan Moore's fault [Re: Ceci n'est pas une chaussette]
Lawson Online   content
Member

Registered: 11/11/02
Posts: 11936
Loc: Lexington, Ky.
Originally Posted By: Ceci n'est pas une chaussette
Originally Posted By: Ted Kilvington
[quote]the long-term "Watchmen brand"


And this, for the record, is pretty much the whole problem in a nutshell.


Har! Yes, Ted reminds me of the Bill Hicks bit:

By the way if anyone here is in advertising or marketing… kill yourself.

No, no, no it’s just a little thought. I’m just trying to plant seeds. Maybe one day, they’ll take root – I don’t know. You try, you do what you can. Kill yourself.

Seriously though, if you are, do.

Aaah, no really, there’s no rationalisation for what you do and you are Satan’s little helpers. Okay – kill yourself – seriously. You are the ruiner of all things good, seriously. No this is not a joke, you’re going, “there’s going to be a joke coming,” there’s no fucking joke coming. You are Satan’s spawn filling the world with bile and garbage. You are fucked and you are fucking us. Kill yourself. It’s the only way to save your fucking soul, kill yourself.

Planting seeds. I know all the marketing people are going, “he’s doing a joke…” there’s no joke here whatsoever. Suck a tail-pipe, fucking hang yourself, borrow a gun from a Yank friend – I don’t care how you do it. Rid the world of your evil fucking makinations. Machi… Whatever, you know what I mean.

I know what all the marketing people are thinking right now too, “Oh, you know what Bill’s doing, he’s going for that anti-marketing dollar. That’s a good market, he’s very smart.”

Oh man, I am not doing that. You fucking evil scumbags!

“Ooh, you know what Bill’s doing now, he’s going for the righteous indignation dollar. That’s a big dollar. A lot of people are feeling that indignation. We’ve done research – huge market. He’s doing a good thing.”

Godammit, I’m not doing that, you scum-bags! Quit putting a godamm dollar sign on every fucking thing on this planet!

“Ooh, the anger dollar. Huge. Huge in times of recession. Giant market, Bill’s very bright to do that.”

God, I’m just caught in a fucking web.

“Ooh the trapped dollar, big dollar, huge dollar. Good market – look at our research. We see that many people feel trapped. If we play to that and then separate them into the trapped dollar…”

How do you live like that? And I bet you sleep like fucking babies at night, don’t you?

“What didya do today honey?”

“Oh, we made ah, we made ah arsenic a childhood food now, goodnight.” [snores] “Yeah we just said you know is your baby really too loud? You know?” [snores] “Yeah, you know the mums will love it.” [snores]

Sleep like fucking children, don’t ya, this is your world isn’t it?

Top
#599221 - 07/05/12 01:36 PM Re: Len Wein: BEFORE WATCHMEN is Alan Moore's fault [Re: Charles Reece]
Ted Kilvington Offline
Member

Registered: 05/10/99
Posts: 1080
Loc: Mason, MI, USA
Originally Posted By: Charles Reece
I'm baffled at Ted's responses: why is he reading Before Watchmen, when Moore's work is such derivative and destructive crap? Were the characters so great, but ultimately spoiled by Moore's treatment that Ted's really hoping that other creators will realize their full potential? It gets more ludicrous as he goes on.


I like the superhero genre. Before Watchmen could be good superhero stories (like the Lee-Kirby Fantastic Four or Alan Moore's work on the ABC line), but if the remaining issues are no better than Nite Owl #1 I probably will stop paying for them.

Some people think talent trumps genre, or that perceived aesthetic qualities matter more than other considerations. I have my aesthetic limits (see my recent review of the DCnU Huntress mini-series. But my aesthetic limits are mine alone, and I don't believe that they are any more or less valid than yours.

And I certainly never said that Moore's work is "crap". On the contrary, I said he is "probably the most talented to have ever worked in the medium". I just think it is a shame he writes so nihilistically (cynically, perhaps?) towards others' creations when he could be doing so much more to elevate the medium.

But if you want to engage me, do so as jack has done, rather than trot out the same tired old arguments that Ceci does.
_________________________
Ted J. Kilvington, Jr.

*****

"I still have that comic, only now it's in liquid form!"

Top
#599222 - 07/05/12 01:45 PM Re: Len Wein: BEFORE WATCHMEN is Alan Moore's fault [Re: Ted Kilvington]
Ceci n'est pas une chaussette Offline
Member

Registered: 12/19/05
Posts: 2822
Originally Posted By: Ted Kilvington
Before Watchmen could be good superhero stories (like the Lee-Kirby Fantastic Four or Alan Moore's work on the ABC line)


No it can't. By virtue of what it is, no it can't. The best you can hope for here is a passably well-crafted Secret Wars,* or any other product of a marketing committee.

Quote:
But if you want to engage me, do so as jack has done, rather than trot out the same tired old arguments that Ceci does.


Apparently they're so tired, they can't even be addressed! The fatigue induced by my arguments forces... FORCES poor Ted to ignore them completely, and just repeat himself over and over and over and over and over and over again. He can barely even find time to make up a strawman and attribute it to me!

But give the plucky little guy credit... somehow, despite the odds, he manages to make up that strawman.

---
*Which is not to say that Secret Wars was well-crafted, of course.
_________________________
"When one says 'Africa,' it refers to Africa in the Euro-colonized sense, not the damn bush country or whatever."
- Ed Gauthier, DCP

Top
#599223 - 07/05/12 01:45 PM Re: Len Wein: BEFORE WATCHMEN is Alan Moore's fault [Re: Lawson]
Ted Kilvington Offline
Member

Registered: 05/10/99
Posts: 1080
Loc: Mason, MI, USA
Originally Posted By: Lawson
Originally Posted By: Ted Kilvington
Wein can't understand why Moore can't be happy with a level of success beyond that which is dreamed by most comic writers.


Did it ever occur to you or Len Wein that Alan Moore doesn't care about the money? Whatever your other hatred of Moore, he routinely leaves money on the table when a project does not interest him creatively. He gives away his movie money. He ignores mainstream publishers when they beg him for stories.

Moore wasn't looking for a payoff here.


Did it ever occur to you that Moore was looking for a payoff in the '80s when he sold the rights to his story to DC? He could have kept the rights and done the story through a smaller publisher, but he chose money over rights. I'm sure he regrets the choice now.
_________________________
Ted J. Kilvington, Jr.

*****

"I still have that comic, only now it's in liquid form!"

Top
#599224 - 07/05/12 01:45 PM Re: Len Wein: BEFORE WATCHMEN is Alan Moore's fault [Re: Lawson]
MBunge Offline
Member

Registered: 07/19/01
Posts: 3386
Loc: Waterloo, Iowa, United States
As someone who thinks there's nothing ethically or morally wrong with BEFORE WATCHMEN, I still have to agree that "We had to do it because Alan Moore won't" is total crap.

And all of the handwaving about Moore's own work and its use of other's creations is just another example that there have always been special rules for special people.

Mike

Top
#599226 - 07/05/12 01:55 PM Re: Len Wein: BEFORE WATCHMEN is Alan Moore's fault [Re: MBunge]
Ted Kilvington Offline
Member

Registered: 05/10/99
Posts: 1080
Loc: Mason, MI, USA
Originally Posted By: Charles Reece
The thing about moral control over art is that the person who treats it morally is better serving the art. Lucas hardly treats his art morally. Kafka wanted to do an immoral thing to his art, destroy it. So, if anyone can make an argument why DC is treating Watchmen more morally than Alan Moore would, feel free.

It's not always easy to separate morality from aesthetics: if a great artist wanted to tamper with the characters from another great artist's creation, which would in turn likely produce great art, then I think that's defensible to do even if the borrowed from artist objects to the borrowing. Simply sucking off the creative juices of a much greater artist to sell books that are really nothing more than a shoddy imitation of what that artist has already done is much more questionable. It certainly won't create art that deserves much moral concern, like the drawings in the Yellow Pages -- no one gives a shit if they're all destroyed.

Having said that, I've made the argument before that I don't see the use of Watchmen characters in BW as being ontologically different than the way Moore uses other people's characters in LOEG. This should be particularly true for Moore, since he believes in Ideaspace where fictional creations all exist together (thus, the characters borrowed from Harry Potter are the same characters, even if given different names).
_________________________
Ted J. Kilvington, Jr.

*****

"I still have that comic, only now it's in liquid form!"

Top
#599232 - 07/05/12 06:16 PM Re: Len Wein: BEFORE WATCHMEN is Alan Moore's fault [Re: Lawson]
Allen Montgomery Online   content
Member

Registered: 05/08/00
Posts: 6909
Originally Posted By: Lawson
“I think after 25 years,” said Wein, “some of the weight of Alan’s objections have lost weight. All of what we are doing we have offered him, and all we are doing he has turned down. We spent a quarter of a century offering him opportunities to do things with these characters, and he kept turning them down.”

He then continues, "This baby wasn't going to rape itself!"
_________________________
"The trouble with being a ghost writer or artist is that you must remain anonymous without credit.
If one wants the credit, one has to cease being a ghost and become a leader or innovator."
— Bob Kane

Top
#599233 - 07/05/12 06:26 PM Re: Len Wein: BEFORE WATCHMEN is Alan Moore's fault [Re: Ted Kilvington]
Allen Montgomery Online   content
Member

Registered: 05/08/00
Posts: 6909
Originally Posted By: Ted Kilvington
In financial terms Moore is one of (if not the) most financially successful writers in the history of the medium

And I would like to see some numbers to support that assertion. Once again, he was coerced into writing Neonomicon for Avatar because he had a looming tax bill.

(Taken in concert with The Courtyard, Neonomicon is quite a great comic, btw)



Originally Posted By: Ted Kilvington
the jury is out on whether Before Watchmen will be a creative success.

Hahaha. No, it isn't.


Originally Posted By: Ted Kilvington
BW's detractors can only hope that BW is such a colossal failure that it will cause the original to go out of print, thus reverting all rights to Moore.

If Watchmen does go out of print for a while, that won't have anything to do with BW. It will be because Warners flooded the market with copies of it before the movie came out. Actually, BW is probably the result of the market for Watchmen sales being completely saturated for the first time in 25 years.
_________________________
"The trouble with being a ghost writer or artist is that you must remain anonymous without credit.
If one wants the credit, one has to cease being a ghost and become a leader or innovator."
— Bob Kane

Top
#599248 - 07/06/12 08:23 AM Re: Len Wein: BEFORE WATCHMEN is Alan Moore's fault [Re: Allen Montgomery]
shjonescrk Online   content
Member

Registered: 10/31/03
Posts: 1338
Loc: Airdrie, Scotland
Ultimately, there is no point to BEFORE WATCHMEN. There wasn't anything that was missing from the original that need to be addressed.

Len Wein's arguments are crass to say the least.

And Allen's right, Neonomicon is a great comic.

Top
#599258 - 07/06/12 08:18 PM Re: Len Wein: BEFORE WATCHMEN is Alan Moore's fault [Re: shjonescrk]
Allen Montgomery Online   content
Member

Registered: 05/08/00
Posts: 6909
I heard quite a few people criticize Neonomicon as being just creature porn. And it is. By itself, it's very much just a prototypical blood-gore-sex comic that one would expect under the Avatar brand. But put it together with the previous mini adapted from Moore's short story and it's absolutely brilliant. The TPB collects the two.
_________________________
"The trouble with being a ghost writer or artist is that you must remain anonymous without credit.
If one wants the credit, one has to cease being a ghost and become a leader or innovator."
— Bob Kane

Top
Page 4 of 5 < 1 2 3 4 5 >


Moderator:  Rick Veitch, Steve Conley