Nobody disputes that women have abortions.
I challenge his assertion, stated as fact, that "plenty" of women have abortions so the pregnancy won't interfere with a vacation.
I also am skeptical that any woman has confided in John Byrne -- of all people -- that she has undergone an abortion, much less her reasons.
Interesting. Once again a well-known (chuckle) JB detractor thinks (chuckle) he knows more than he actually knows. Based on message forum postings & a few interviews, you know about JB's personal life (
John Byrne -- of all people) in regards to women.
And you're slightly misquoting (say it ain't so!). By taking away a couple of simple words (
of cases) it changes the dichotomy, which is, of course, your intention (IMO).
Your apparent rush to FINALLY get something on JB (it's been a while since anyone has done so to any degree of significance) is your downfall (as it usually is with most detractors).
Is JB exaggerating for effect? Maybe. It depends on how one defines "plenty of cases," right? Too many variables & yet another waste of time for a cowardly detractor to
argue about from a
safe distance...so to speak.
Now...let's see if this brings about the typical reaction of spotlight switching or can you actually admit you jumped the gun...yet again (chuckle)?