Topic Options
#601131 - 10/02/12 02:40 PM tv shows.
madget Offline
Member

Registered: 05/11/01
Posts: 4870

So, Breaking Bad's done for the year, and while I've had a little time between jobs, I checked out a couple others shows that came to me highly recommended. Probably some general spoilers ahead, but I make these posts up as I go...

GAME OF THRONES:

As entertaining as promised by various people who recommended it to me. Sort of insanely addictive after a few episodes, and Peter Dinklage is what critics would call "a revelation" here. His character is a weirdly terrific highlight in an engaging, generally well-executed fantasy soap-opera -- part Lord of the Rings, part Tudors (with actors borrowed from both). I ripped through its two existing seasons in an embarrassingly short amount of time. To me, it doesn't have the same kind of artistic gravitas as my pet show Breaking Bad, but it's sure fun to watch.

THE SHIELD:

Speaking of BB, I turned to The Shield because it came up a lot in articles about that show, in the context of comments like "best show since The Shield went off the air!" I caught a little of this show back in its early days, it seemed sort of enjoyable, if a bit self-consciously "hardcore" (it is) so I decided to have a more thorough look.

Mostly I enjoyed it, I suppose, but it drags quite a bit over the course of seven seasons, and I'd probably peg it as a tad overrated on the whole. Still, it has merits. The show has an interesting design, in that there is a central, ongoing narrative with a trajectory that lasts through seven seasons, but it's punctuated with season-specific subplots, which are further punctuated with smaller, single-episode cases. It's a clever, ambitious structure, which attempts to provide all the hooks and narrative rewards of: an ongoing soap-opera, a police procedural, a detective show, a political chess-match, and of course, a meditation on the nature of corruption. But, maybe it tries to do a little too much for its own good, because by the third season or so, I found myself losing interest and patience in the various one-off cases and side tangents revolving around the strike team's central narrative. They began to feel like baggage rather than a perk, and almost all of the characters -- particularly the relatively "uncorrupted" ones (Dani, Julian, Claudette, and to some extent Wagenbach -- all of which I probably just spelled wrong) -- grated on my nerves at least as often as not. Although periodically interesting, I just didn't especially like any of these people, and their characterization sometimes seemed arbitrary.

While Mackey and his crew -- the main characters, on the whole -- are pretty engrossing and well-developed in their way, they can't shake a certain cartoonishness somehow, and Chiklis' tough guy persona becomes pretty comical by dint of season-to-season reptition, a kind of parody of itself almost. By the dozenth time Chiklis is kicking a door in to administer an over-the-line beatdown to a gangsta that he's probably going to blatantly plant evidence on to coerce the subject's cooperation in some shady scheme -- which, as it happens, has probably elapsed before even the halfway point of Season 1 -- you've kind of seen enough of it. But you will see that same scenario play out in almost exactly the same way probably another ten to twenty times per season, until the end. Seasons 3-6 I skimmed through much of, to be honest, to get to the good parts, or just to see what exactly happens. Forest Whittaker's weirdly creepy performance slowed me down a little, as did the final season, but the show's a bit overstuffed as a whole, and probably a tad sillier than it wants to believe.

Anyway, I guess I was pretty satisfied by the way they resolve Mackey's central narrative, and the show does a good job of making him the penultimate traitor while still giving you reason to believe that his loyalties were passionate and true -- while they lasted. And the reasons for their dissolution are often somewhat understandable. I can understand the comparisons to Breaking Bad (and certainly THE WIRE took quite a few queues from this). While Mackey is pretty "bad" from the beginning, we rarely doubt that he isn't someone we'd want on our side when the chips were down. He's aggressive, fearless, smart, effective, and seemingly very loyal. Above all, though, he's a survivor: and The Shield allows him to survive, to "win," as is fitting to his nature, while also painting a foreboding picture of how crushingly lonely it can be, to be the last man standing.

K

Top
#601132 - 10/02/12 03:00 PM Re: tv shows. [Re: madget]
Jimbo Offline
Member

Registered: 07/13/01
Posts: 2751
Loc: New Zealand/Canada
Great analysis, madget. The Shield has been my favorite for years, I think your take on it is very fair. What did you think of Glenn Close's performance?

Lately I've been watching Sons of Anarchy, Hell on Wheels and am just now working my way through season 2 of Boardwalk Empire. While I'm behind with Boardwalk Empire, it's quite a novelty for me to be able to actually be up-to-date with shows I like. Not having to avoid spoilers for months, sometimes years on end, is very nice indeed.
_________________________
Walla Walla Bing Bang.

Top
#601138 - 10/02/12 06:03 PM Re: tv shows. [Re: Jimbo]
madget Offline
Member

Registered: 05/11/01
Posts: 4870
To be honest, I didn't care for Glenn Close in the series. I gather that opinions about her were pretty divided, and some people felt she was a highlight. To me, her character seemed a very forced-in "movie-celebrity" addition, and I wasn't sure what function she really served, in the grand scheme of the story. I read an interview with the creator of the show, wherein he admitted that her arc was probably the weakest major arc of the show's run. I agree with him; I didn't feel she added anything of interest or real import to the ongoing narrative. I'd grown to be pretty interested in David Asseveda by the time of her introduction; replacing him (his original function, anyway) with what felt like a needless, season-long cameo rubbed me the wrong way. And while I've nothing in particular against Glenn Close, I somehow wasn't quite buying her as the tough-as-nails-but-still-sorta-nervous-about-being-new-on-the-job captain.

Mind you, Forrest Whittaker was just as questionably conspicuous an addition, and probably an equally superfluous one in the grand scheme, but his character was just so fucking creepy and weird, that I couldn't help but get a bit sucked into his arc. It was a bizarre performance/character, and a character who, at the very least, added a very tangible tension and danger. His eventual unraveling -- or hell, his mere existence as an IED agent, being as weird as he was -- does come to mind as one of the show's sillier indulgences; but, he was at least fun to watch.

Haven't seen any of those others. I think I have a season of Deadwood around I might watch next. But I've been watching a lot of TV lately, I'm starting to feel guilty about it. May need a break.

K

Top


Moderator:  Rick Veitch, Steve Conley