Page 3 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >
Topic Options
#599236 - 07/05/12 07:44 PM Re: John Byrne doesn't have to take your abuse! [Re: Lawson]
Paul W. Sondersted, Jr. Offline
Member

Registered: 07/22/01
Posts: 4593
Loc: Sparks, Nevada, United States
Hmmmm. Another detractive theory shot to pieces?

Oh, and I have quoted JB quite often here & other places (do your own homework) & have yet to have my hand slapped in any way, shape or form. Perhaps it's because I don't do so with negative intentions? Nah, nothing as simple at that!

Top
#599237 - 07/05/12 07:59 PM Re: John Byrne doesn't have to take your abuse! [Re: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.]
Budman Offline
Member

Registered: 12/13/01
Posts: 1868
Loc: Penfield, Ny USA
That theory people including myself posted here and elsewhere on this board is just that--an educated guess based on current events over at the byrne board. Hence, therefore and in conclusion, we have nothing to apologize for or feel guilty of.


Now, carry on and cross your fingers that they make the movies,star trek star wars and tv section viewable as well.
_________________________
"God you are a Genius Budman." --Alexander Ness
"I know." --Budman

Top
#599238 - 07/05/12 08:00 PM Re: John Byrne doesn't have to take your abuse! [Re: Budman]
Budman Offline
Member

Registered: 12/13/01
Posts: 1868
Loc: Penfield, Ny USA
Screw the music section
_________________________
"God you are a Genius Budman." --Alexander Ness
"I know." --Budman

Top
#599239 - 07/05/12 08:43 PM Re: John Byrne doesn't have to take your abuse! [Re: Budman]
Alexander Ness Online   shocked
Member

Registered: 09/17/03
Posts: 3869
Loc: Minnesota
Originally Posted By: Budman
That theory people including myself posted here and elsewhere on this board is just that--an educated guess based on current events over at the byrne board. Hence, therefore and in conclusion, we have nothing to apologize for or feel guilty of.


Now, carry on and cross your fingers that they make the movies,star trek star wars and tv section viewable as well.



Well I for one will continue not to post on the Byrne board in protest of your not apologizing!

Top
#599240 - 07/05/12 08:48 PM Re: John Byrne doesn't have to take your abuse! [Re: Alexander Ness]
Budman Offline
Member

Registered: 12/13/01
Posts: 1868
Loc: Penfield, Ny USA
In my best Mr. Burns voice from the Simpson's:

"Eeeexcellent!"
(And that includes the maniacle twiddling of the fingers when I say it.)
_________________________
"God you are a Genius Budman." --Alexander Ness
"I know." --Budman

Top
#599241 - 07/05/12 08:52 PM Re: John Byrne doesn't have to take your abuse! [Re: Budman]
Alexander Ness Online   shocked
Member

Registered: 09/17/03
Posts: 3869
Loc: Minnesota
pssst I am drinking beer. Beer am good.

Top
#599244 - 07/05/12 10:00 PM Re: John Byrne doesn't have to take your abuse! [Re: Alexander Ness]
Budman Offline
Member

Registered: 12/13/01
Posts: 1868
Loc: Penfield, Ny USA
Yes. Beer am good. Keep going...
_________________________
"God you are a Genius Budman." --Alexander Ness
"I know." --Budman

Top
#599247 - 07/05/12 10:38 PM Re: John Byrne doesn't have to take your abuse! [Re: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.]
Peter Urkowitz Offline
Member

Registered: 08/28/00
Posts: 3231
Loc: Salem, MA, USA
Originally Posted By: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.
Hmmmm. Another detractive theory shot to pieces?


It appears so! My apologies to Mr. Byrne for doubting his courage and openness to the world. My thanks to him, also, for relieving me of my small dilemma of whether or not to quote from there, even with negative intentions!

Top
#599274 - 07/07/12 02:00 AM Re: John Byrne doesn't have to take your abuse! [Re: Peter Urkowitz]
Paul W. Sondersted, Jr. Offline
Member

Registered: 07/22/01
Posts: 4593
Loc: Sparks, Nevada, United States
Post that over at the JBF! crazy

Top
#599277 - 07/07/12 09:10 AM Re: John Byrne doesn't have to take your abuse! [Re: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.]
Peter Urkowitz Offline
Member

Registered: 08/28/00
Posts: 3231
Loc: Salem, MA, USA
Originally Posted By: Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.
Post that over at the JBF! crazy


I think that would be unnecessarily provocative. I'm not looking to start any fights over there.

Top
Page 3 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >


Moderator:  Rick Veitch, Steve Conley