What frequently happens with Paul when he finds himself appropriately dissected, is that he posts things that don't make much sense and don't track in relation to the post that he's ostensibly commenting about.

His material? This makes not a whit of sense, but I suppose that something is rattling around in Paul's head that makes sense to him even though there's nothing to link it to any real world explanation.

Last person to bring up originality? I guess he thinks that calling him on both his sociopathy and his incompetence has already happened and shouldn't be mentioned again, which makes about as much sense as his contention that Byrne's behavior is acceptable to most people and shouldn't be pointed out as self-aggrandizing and self-destructive.

He then ends by throwing out a bit of dismissiveness which has always been Sonderspeak short-hand for "I can't in any counter what you've said so I'll pretend that you haven't said anything that needs to be countered."

In summation, and not for the first or last time, I'll state the obvious at the end of a post about Paul;


He's a sociopath with poor communication skills, anger issues and a self-perception problem. He cares far less about anything Byrne-related than he does about the opportunity to try and cause discomfort to other people who comment on the topic, and his ability to relate to other human beings has some serious flaws.

(...and someday the true story of how he met his wife will make for interesting reading, but I'll save that little tale for some other intrepid reporter. All I'm telling y'all is that Paul is an unusual man.)

Catering again? Tsk. Tsk. Tsk. Stop being so boring with your predictability.

As usual, you have absolutely no grasp on reality. You make assertions & guesses that fall so far from anything even remotely close to the truth.

Once again, same old song & dance. In reality, you're tripping over two left feet.

And please point out where I said JB's negative behavior (when it happens) is acceptable.

And you think you have some sort of revelation about my personal life? And it's interesting? And it seems your source is elsewhere? Hmmmmm. A detractor believing hearsay? What are the odds?

You have nothing & you know it. You're shooting blanks. You're just continuing with your usual preaching to the converted. Lame...as expected.

:rolleyes:

I find it amusing that Paul thinks he's in a position to judge whether or not someone else has a grasp on reality.

I don't expect the little guy to back up anything that he says, but I do expect him to continue to hurl unsupported statements in the hopes of convincing himself that he isn't entirely lost and ineffective. I wonder whether, considering his inability to convince anyone else of anything, he's even able to convince himself that he has merit. My guess is not but I wouldn't expect himto be capable of admitting so.

It's not that interesting, Paul, because it's about you and how interesting could that possibly be? Despite your sociopathic trollery you're a good joke and not much else.

Just out of curiousity, though, how did you meet your wife?

Only because the reality you are attempting to grasp involves myself & your little guessing games are terribly imprecise. You just can't face that particular reality & it must be driving you nuts, based only on the fact of your persistence in crying out the same old baloney with huge slices of salami.

And anyone with even a teeny tiny bit of a grasp onto reality will know that your guesses are not proof positive...unless you are, you know, of like mindlessness.

Sorry (not really). You started this game. Let's see how valid your source is. You first.

Your supposition (unfounded and unsupported as usual) that you're evasiveness is anything other than a humorous diversion is inaccurate. Your statements that my analysis is incorrect based solely on your say-so has no foundation to be believed. You don't and can't provide any information that shows any inaccuracy in what I've said.

I, on the other hand, have clearly shown the pattern of your obsessive and trollish behavior. Sorry, Paul, but your protestations aren't proof of anything other than that you'd like to be perceived in some other way than the way that you're perceived.

My suppositions may not be proofs, but they carry a lot more weight than you're whining and denials. I back up what I say with logic trains while you back up what you say solely with insults and denials. I'm pretty clear here that you have a tentative grasp on what is real and that colors the reasoning of believing anything that you say and can't provide a proof for.

Are you feeling a little ashamed or embarrassed about something? Why would you want to hide a true love story that would humanize you? Or wouldn't it do that?