 |

|
|
|
|
#8524 - 03/16/08 09:40 PM
Re: Byrne Fund
|
Member
Registered: 06/16/01
Posts: 2865
Loc: Los Angeles
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#8525 - 03/17/08 10:33 AM
Re: Byrne Fund
|
Member
Registered: 07/22/01
Posts: 4593
Loc: Sparks, Nevada, United States
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#8526 - 03/17/08 10:55 AM
Re: Byrne Fund
|
Member
Registered: 07/22/01
Posts: 4593
Loc: Sparks, Nevada, United States
|
Originally posted by IvanJim: As for your marriage, I've merely pointed out that there might be an interesting anecdote about your life that I thought you might like to share. I'm choosing to let you put facts in evidence since you'd be in a place to attest to them. Um, no. Once again, I will quote you, "(...and someday the true story of how he met his wife will make for interesting reading, but I'll save that little tale for some other intrepid reporter. All I'm telling y'all is that Paul is an unusual man.)" This in no way indicates that I am an "intrepid reporter", that would show some sort of positive aspect about me that you would never consider (sniff!). No, you imply that someone else will provide a "little tale" & that this "little tale" will prove that "Paul is an unusual man." Originally posted by IvanJim: Why are you being so evasive about the big romance in your life? Nope. You're the one who is being evasive. I'm waiting patiently for you to provide the not-so-interesting "little tale" you mentioned. You know, the one that will tell the "true story" of how I met my wife? Did you back yourself into a corner here? Most with "truth" on their side are not usually so evasive. C'mon! Everyone's watching! You have another (chuckle) opportunity to demonstrate your remarkable skills at perception & psychoanalysis. The clock is ticking!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#8527 - 03/17/08 12:10 PM
Re: Byrne Fund
|
Member
Registered: 06/15/02
Posts: 5325
Loc: Not Applicable, USA
|
It's amazing how quickly Paul can take what was clearly a joke thread and turn it into one of Those Threads. From a couple of stupid jokes to more of the same with the speed of a bullet.
I'd call it a gift, but that would be like calling the ability to give someone cancer a gift.
For a guy who claims to be against Byrne-related negativity, is there anyone here who has done more to ensure Byrne-related negativity remains front and center on these boards than Paul?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#8529 - 03/17/08 12:41 PM
Re: Byrne Fund
|
Member
Registered: 06/16/01
Posts: 2865
Loc: Los Angeles
|
Originally posted by Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.: Nah. You surrounded yourself with a bunch of OTHER nay-sayers & exaggerators (AH-NOLD!). These others, who also just so happen to thrive on negativity, provide you with as much credibility as any other prejudiced individuals would. Surround myself? Do you think that there's some central headquarters where D.E.T.R.A.C.T.O.R. meets to plot ways to bring down the mighty and holy Sondersted? Despite your wanting to condemn everyone who can see through your paranoia and foolishness as being part of a conspiratorial delusion, the plain truth of the matter is that your intellectual dishonesty and lack of credibility are things that most everyone seems to pick up on without needing to consult anyone else. Anyone interested in REAL evidence, logic & credibility, shouldn't be so quick to associate themselves with individuals whose main interest appears to be to distort evidence, avoid logic & garner credibility from a bunch of anonymous cowards. Not only are you transparent, your inability to understand anyone else's motivations is equally transparent. Frankly, Paul, it's patently obvious to one and all that you're a troll, and it only takes a little probing to see that your also a sociopath. Think about it, credibility from people practically cowering in anonymity. If you're proud of that, then you fall back into being very delusional...again. There's nobody cowering, Paul, just a lot of separate individuals noticing that you're a fool, a hypocrite, and intellectually challenged, and that you're usually inaccurate in your interpretations of what's going on at any given time. The reason you don't get any respect here isn't because there's something wrong with everyone here except you; it's because it's clear to one and all that there's something not quite right about you.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#8530 - 03/17/08 12:56 PM
Re: Byrne Fund
|
Member
Registered: 06/16/01
Posts: 2865
Loc: Los Angeles
|
Originally posted by Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.: Once again, I will quote you, "(...and someday the true story of how he met his wife will make for interesting reading, but I'll save that little tale for some other intrepid reporter. All I'm telling y'all is that Paul is an unusual man.)"
This in no way indicates that I am an "intrepid reporter", that would show some sort of positive aspect about me that you would never consider (sniff!). No, you imply that someone else will provide a "little tale" & that this "little tale" will prove that "Paul is an unusual man."That's partially accurate, Paul, but mostly an inaccurate and dishonest reading on your part. Of course you aren't an intrepid reporter, being neither an honest reporter nor in any way intrepid, but you do know the story of how you met your wife. You certainly could provide the tale (though whether you'd be honest is obviously another matter), and then there wouldn't be a need to correct anything that you saw as inaccurate at a later date. Your finances are also unusual and I didn't break that story, nor did I even comment on it until you proclaimed that you didn't mind people doing so. You know perfectly well that you're an odd and unusual man and if you weren't craven I'd expect that you wouldn't be trying to hide the details of who you are and what you do when you're not on line. So I'll ask again, how did you meet your wife? ]Nope. You're the one who is being evasive. I'm waiting patiently for you to provide the not-so-interesting "little tale" you mentioned. You know, the one that will tell the "true story" of how I met my wife?
Did you back yourself into a corner here? Most with "truth" on their side are not usually so evasive. It seems to me that you're the one who is desperate to hide and deny information here. Heck, you've already preemptively denied that there's anything interesting at all about a story that should be interesting to any man who's actually in love with his wife. So how did you meet your wife and how did you come to marry one another? C'mon! Everyone's watching! You have another (chuckle) opportunity to demonstrate your remarkable skills at perception & psychoanalysis.
The clock is ticking! The clock is ticking? Does that mean something to you? Is there a deadline that compels you to try and push things along? I've already said that I won't be the first person to reveal information about you, so why don't you tell your version of reality and avoid innuendo? Is there some reason that you don't feel proud about your situation?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#8531 - 03/17/08 01:11 PM
Re: Byrne Fund
|
Member
Registered: 11/28/00
Posts: 13263
Loc: AZ
|
Originally posted by geedis: It's not the amount of time, it's how that time is spent. Or in your case, squandered.
_________________________
Comfort the disturbed, disturb the comfortable
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#8532 - 03/17/08 02:09 PM
Re: Byrne Fund
|
Member
Registered: 07/22/01
Posts: 4593
Loc: Sparks, Nevada, United States
|
Originally posted by IvanJim: Originally posted by Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.: Nah. You surrounded yourself with a bunch of OTHER nay-sayers & exaggerators (AH-NOLD!). These others, who also just so happen to thrive on negativity, provide you with as much credibility as any other prejudiced individuals would. Surround myself? Do you think that there's some central headquarters where D.E.T.R.A.C.T.O.R. meets to plot ways to bring down the mighty and holy Sondersted? Despite your wanting to condemn everyone who can see through your paranoia and foolishness as being part of a conspiratorial delusion, the plain truth of the matter is that your intellectual dishonesty and lack of credibility are things that most everyone seems to pick up on without needing to consult anyone else.Lack of credibility? With a bunch of detractors? That's a darn nice compliment. Many thanks! Originally posted by IvanJim: Anyone interested in REAL evidence, logic & credibility, shouldn't be so quick to associate themselves with individuals whose main interest appears to be to distort evidence, avoid logic & garner credibility from a bunch of anonymous cowards. Not only are you transparent, your inability to understand anyone else's motivations is equally transparent. Frankly, Paul, it's patently obvious to one and all that you're a troll, and it only takes a little probing to see that your also a sociopath. . Probing into words on a message forum? Say it with me now...Very delusional.
Originally posted by IvanJim: Think about it, credibility from people practically cowering in anonymity. If you're proud of that, then you fall back into being very delusional...again. There's nobody cowering, Paul, just a lot of separate individuals noticing that you're a fool, a hypocrite, and intellectually challenged, and that you're usually inaccurate in your interpretations of what's going on at any given time. A lot of separate individuals? Prove it.
Originally posted by IvanJim: The reason you don't get any respect here isn't because there's something wrong with everyone here except you; it's because it's clear to one and all that there's something not quite right about you. I don't get any respect from detractors? And detractors believe that there's something wrong with me? Is life worth living, now? 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#8533 - 03/17/08 02:35 PM
Re: Byrne Fund
|
Member
Registered: 11/28/00
Posts: 13263
Loc: AZ
|
You're squandering. A lot. Geez, look at all that posting up there, and it all says the same things over and over.
_________________________
Comfort the disturbed, disturb the comfortable
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |