I can't say that I'm surprised that SlowJoe didn't get the reference, what with the difficulty in thinking and all, but I'd hoped that Geedis would have enough self-awareness to recognize the reason for the reference.

I sincerely apologize for once again over-estimating Geedis' intellect. I really should stop giving him so much credit.

So. There's currently a Senator who's running for President in the Democratic primary who's been making a habit of misinterpreting the words of her chief rival and expressing disappointment and dismay that he'd say such things. Tsk tsk.

She also misrepresents her own words and actions, and consistently makes the same charges that have been made against her but without any proof to back up her simplistic comebacks.

Although the honorable senator is obviously far more accomplished than our Geedis, the obvious and dishonest dissembling seems to be something that Geedis is indulging himself in, albeit less artfully or effectively than the senator. The pretense of confusing the two dissemblers is simply a way of teasing Geedis about his integrity in the way he posts.

I'm sure that SlowJoe won't get this, but I do think that Geedis (who is, let's face it, not quite as dim as SlowJoe) might appreciate the comparison although he'll probably publicly decry and deny it, or just pretend that something entirely different was written other than what actually exists in front of his eyes.

That little cuss is nothing if not predictable.

Wow. Even if one agreed with the underlying politics, your Hillary/geedis comparison is really lame rhetoric.
Claiming people have said things without context, or are taking you out of context, is a real safety blanket for you, huh. I don’t know why you make postings that are demonstrably false (people only have to go back and read what I wrote to see you’re wrong), but meh… your issues.

On one hand it’s funny to watch you continue to unnecessarily bring up an old argument while trying to pretend you aren’t bitter about it. On the other hand, as a responsible member of society, I feel I should recommend you let it go, for your own sake. It’s just not healthy to let this stuff eat away at you.

Jeez, this is like a 70's Marvel comic - the good guys fight each other whilst the villian (Captain Ass-hat Byrne) and his lackey (Sonderdeadhead) make their escape.

70s Marvel? That stuff's always popular. Just look at World War Hulk and Civil War. But yeah, the rule pretty much seemed to be when one hero team or individual first met another, they had to fight each other due to some misunderstanding, before eventually overcoming the villain. It's a result of fanboy fasination with "who would win in a fight between...?"

So, who would win in a fight between Joe Lee & IvanJim? Joe should have the upper hand, with his ability to actually be witty rather than rely on a tired sarcastic refrain. But Ivan's Forcefield of Pomposity can seem endless...

Or maybe you're a just a dick.

Really? You feel it worth bringing up when someone calls you a name?

I'm sorry you seem to find such a mild insult so obscene. I thought we were all adults here, (Despite all evidence to the contrary). I didn't realize you were so sensitive, what with you having been name calling for days, creating nick-names for everyone. Using them repeatedly.

Perhaps you're getting frustrated that your mere words haven't actually frustrated anyone?

Or maybe you're a just an opportunistic and disingenuous dick.

Who are you talking to?

One happy dysfunctional family.

Good guys?

You really expect him to be ABLE to answer that? I mean, he thought a post of mine that immediately followed Joe Lee's post was me responding directly to him.

He's just as delusional as I have always said & this thread proves it.

Next thing you know, he'll be editing my post in one of his delusional responses & changing things to make it seem otherwise.

Nah!

He's just as delusional as I have always said & this thread proves it.

--------------------
~Paul W. Sondersted, Jr.


True when Paul says so - False when anyone else says so. Paul can deduce things about people from reading thier words on the internet - but no one else can.

Hope that clears SOMETHING up.

That's an odd question. I'm posting opinions and thoughts on a message board. Some of them are about you. Did you really not get that?

Are you implying that I'm mistaken in thinking that you're not as dim as SlowJoe? Admittedly you're in a better position to know that than I am, but the way the two of you post I think the probability is that it's accurate. Which isn't to say that you're terribly bright, but I'm guessing that you're just bright enough to know what I'm talking about. I might be overestimating you, but you're the one who'll be able to say what you know.