posted
I wouldn't know which way to go with this argument. It depends on how you look at things: will the new management at TW look at DC Comics as a whole, and say, well, things are at least OK, not great, or will they go comic by comic and say, kill this? I personally hope that the TW execs are like the execs at Enron--where apparently no one looked at anything. There are a number of scenarios that could come to pass if one of the big 2 goes under: DC goes out of business, some other company licenses their mainstays, Batman and Superman. Or: DC dies, the various characters are licensed to several different companies, which would certainly alter DC continuity. The same thing would apply to Marvel; but I suspect in that case DC would simply negotiate for the whole Marvel line (I don't know if Marvel would have the money to negotiate for the whole DC line if DC went out of business). Or, someone like Jim Shooter, who once attempted to buy Marvel, would step in. There are any number of interesting scenarios, none of which I hope comes to pass.
-------------------- Allen Smith Posts: 878 | Registered: Oct 2001
| IP: Logged |
So I've been reading this thread, and TCJ articles about the distribution problems, and Dark Horse's big book. I think what's missing (for me, anyway) is a sense of scale and an explanation for the industry's tendency towards a distribution system.
[Sidebar: I don't think Diamond wants a monopoly. The guy on top of the monopoly would be the first one to go in any major industry upheaval; the man who would be casualty. Steve Geppi probably didn't get to be this successful by not understanding such things. Diamond as a company has to work within its circumstances and conditions. As the monopolist, there is a certain vulnerability in its own inertia as top dog. When a change comes -- a matter of "when", not "if", for good or bad -- the company may become a temporary despot to be overthrown, irrelevant in the face of a new age, crushed from above, torn apart from below, or at least reduced in stature. That last might be best for all because, hey, who among us would object to Diamond being, say, two or three times bigger than its peak if there were some decent competition?]
In a nutshell, why do we need distributors? What do they do that couldn't be accomplished by publishers, printers, retailers?
My thinking on this comes from all the reaction to Marvel's purchase of Heroes World, the 3rd largest distributor in 1994. Basically, why didn't it work? "Because this is Marvel and they're stupid and they don't know what they're doing." But then what if anything was inherently flawed about the basic idea?
Say, if intelligent, decent people were handling the show at the time. No gunboat diplomacy, Marvel Mart or such nonsense. Perhaps in an alternate universe where they offered Walter Wang a nice big check for his company.
First of all, it could do some trimming on go-betweens from the publisher and distributor, and the distributor's cut of the discount takes less accounting for. The publisher has a greater stake in its own products. Could a fairly level field have been established if Marvel had said "Dark Horse, DC, Diamond, Capital, Image, et al, come, let us reason together."?
My rough guess involves supplying other distributors with Marvel comics at equivalent discounts and working out an amicable solution on Marvel Distribution's handling of other accounts. They would even have more access to individual retailers (cushioned by infrastructure no doubt, but still...). Catalogues could be, hell I don't know, outsourced or sent by each company to the printers. A commitment, in other words, to the direct market which would still allow the guys at the top to plan their theme parks and Planet Murderworlds and even Marvel Mart as a non-direct market program, selling Spider-Man stuff to Wal-Mart or whoever.
And if it seems feasible for Marvel (in my mind -- and theirs -- anyway), other publishers might have (had) a similar chance. Would it be too difficult to directly distribute? Even for smaller companies, who have less volume to ship?
I reach the crux of my questioning. What this a feasible idea then and/or would it be feasible now?
In writing the above, I notice a few deficiencies in my perspective. The first, that I am working from hindsight through patchworks of perhaps-biased information. I have also spent my entire adult life in a world of fax machines, Fed Ex and e-mail. For this, I can only apologize and plead ignorance.
The other deficiency is one of specifics. There are stories of work crews in warehouses and boxes 'pon boxes, quiet expositions of how such-and-such was closer to the printer than so-and-so and could get shipments earlier. But what's missing is a more thorough understanding of the structure of distribution. [I'm pretty ignorant of fax machines, Fed Ex and e-mail too.] What does a distributor do? How much does a distributor take to do what it does? How is it different now from the day when moving a hundred thousand copies was considered poor sales?
quote:In a nutshell, why do we need distributors? What do they do that couldn't be accomplished by publishers, printers, retailers?
Because no retailer wants to have to deal with a couple of dozen (or, if he's really a complete retailer and carries at least one title from every publisher listed in Previews a couple of hundred) publishers every month. Easier to deal with one source that gathers all those publishers' works together and markets them to the retailer.
posted
Mr. O'Neill's right on target about why distributors (or rather, wholesalers, which is really what we're talking about here) are important and necessary to the comic book indusry.
Setting aside the distractions of deal-making and exculisves and whatnot, Diamond's primary service to much of the comics industry is as a wholesaler, operating as wholesalers do: purchasing items from a variety of suppliers and re-selling them to individual retailers. The service provided to retailers is 'one-stop shopping' so that the retailers don't have to maintain accounts and small orders with multiple suppliers. The service provided to manufacturers (publishers) is that they don't have to maintain systems to receive, process, fulfill, invoice, and collect a multitude of small orders from individual retailers.
One might envision a future of the comics industry somewhat similar to what exists in the traditional book industry whereby manufacturers (publishers) maintain sufficient fulfillment/credt/collections/etc. systems so that they can sell both directly to individual retailers and to various wholesalers, thus affording multiple sales venues by which retailers can acquire and manufacturers can sell their wares. But realistically, that's a way in the future yet.
Regardless, the wholesaler segment of the industry is not going to disappear, nor, I would argue, should it.
-------------------- "[T]hough goodness without knowledge is weak and feeble, yet knowledge without goodness is dangerous, and that both united form the noblest character, and lay the surest foundation of usefulness to mankind." --John Phillips
Posts: 1169 | From: New York, NY | Registered: May 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
Good Lord! This thread's been going on for over three YEARS! Wait- Historical comic book thread. That should be "Good Lord *Choke*!"
Anyways, I'm a newbie to this board, but I have been around for a while, so allow me to add my two cents, relative to the "historical" part of the thread:
.....
I never met Carol Kalish, but was well aware of her importance, and aware of the "this would have never happened if Carol were still alive" school of thought. I mentioned it to someone (formerly a very heavy hitter, and still in the industry, let's just call him "John"- an often generic name) in conversation several years ago. He told me that he felt that if she had lived, it would have meant nothing to Marvel. She was already being pushed out, her Marvel influence was already drastically weakened at the time of her passing. He said Lou Bank definitely wasn't the pusher- he was the next-in-line for the job, and (IIRC) Carol's protege, so his days were numbered as soon as he took over her position.
Jim's mention of Joey Calamari's apparently being involved in a start-up with Ms.Kalish certainly adds credence to John's statement, and John's statement adds credence to the possibility that the start-up was a reality.
.....
On Walter Wang and the Comics Unlimited "shot across the bows" Just a vignette:
It must have been 1994 when I attended an Andromeda retailer meeting, and got into a conversation with ...um... a Marvel Guy, again, pretty heavy, someone who just recently left the company. Let's call him "MaRg".
I brought up the subject of Comics Unlimited, and Marg immediately launched into a mini-tirade about "teaching these bastards (distributors) a lesson", "they think they're big shots" and so on. The odd thing was that he claimed cutting off Wang was his idea. He did this before I could really say anything.
When he wound down a bit, I managed to interject "didn't anyone run it through legal" and he was off again, with "yeah, and they felt that while we weren't really solid, Marvel would win any suit that Wang brought, because they couldn't afford the kind of lawyers we could and we would wear them down over time, and the point being made to the others was much more important than the legal fees..." It was all about the exercise of power. Marg went on about distributors insulting Marvel, and Marvel having to take action to show them who was boss. He said they were looking to make an example of someone unimportant and CU was in negotiations to sell out to Diamond anyways.
Quite extraordinary, but I think he was feeling a bit rambunctious- most of the retailers were either fawning over Nicieza & Lobdell, or castigating him for the pathetic animated FF cartoon they were featuring, or laughing at their "big" promo item, a dispenser for those cards they used to do to keep track of crossover series. He must have felt I was a sympathetic ear or something...
Anyways, I finally brought up my question: I was curious about Marvel Legal's approach to the concept of consideration that Marvel caused CU financial harm due to something that they published in their newsletter. (Marvel had made no bones that it was a direct cause and response.) Wasn't it conceivable that they had left themselves open to a violation of civil rights prosecution? I was coming at this as a Canadian, based on my limited knowledge of the US Bill of Rights, and I was curious about how it had been taken into consideration.
MaRg blanched. His face literally turned white, and he took a step back. He just... stopped for a second, obviously stunned by the idea. I gather legal hadn't considered this aspect.
He was off again in a second or two, but deftly switched to justifying a coming price increase for mainstream Marvels on the basis that "people could scream all they want, but it's important to establish that Spiderman's more important than Spawn, and that the only reason Marvel was raising prices was to remind the industry that they were the leaders, not Image, and that there was no way that Marvel was going to tolerate their flagship character taking a back seat to Image's flagship character in any way, including price, and blablablabla...."
Like I said, just a little vignette.... -and obviously the quotes aren't verbatim, but they were noted down at the time because they were so extraordinary
posted
Re: Previews, Diamond and Stores: One book, one look. All stores now carry the same boring merchandise. When stores had to shop different sources, that made them unique. Consumers shifted from store to store on weekend haunts for what's new. The need doesn't exist anymore since the one book one look mentality took over. Previews/Diamond=one distributor. The industry has changed.
Posts: 357 | Registered: Dec 1999
| IP: Logged |
In a nutshell, why do we need distributors? What do they do that couldn't be accomplished by publishers, printers, retailers?
.
Not only, as Pat points out, do retailers not want to deal with several dozen suppliers each, but publishers and manufacturers really don't want to deal with several thousand customers each.
That's why.
Posts: 453 | From: Oakland, CA USA | Registered: Nov 1999
| IP: Logged |
My thinking on this comes from all the reaction to Marvel's purchase of Heroes World, the 3rd largest distributor in 1994. Basically, why didn't it work? "Because this is Marvel and they're stupid and they don't know what they're doing." But then what if anything was inherently flawed about the basic idea?
Say, if intelligent, decent people were handling the show at the time. No gunboat diplomacy, Marvel Mart or such nonsense. Perhaps in an alternate universe where they offered Walter Wang a nice big check for his company.
Or imagine if they'd been slightly smart and had acquired Heroes World through a shell company without revealing their involvement and then spent a couple of years building a national distribution system before going exclusive.
Posts: 257 | From: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia | Registered: Jul 1999
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yes, that would be part of it. Okay, leaving aside the objections of those above who have the temerity to be intelligent and informed about what they're saying why wouldn't it have worked for Marvel in this alternate universe where they were intelligent and progressive? If you can get your Marvels, your DCs, Image etc. all from one source [Marvel's pet distributor] wouldn't that be seen by most retailers as an improvement? Or a store owner can continue to go through Diamond, Capital, etc.
It feels like I'm violating some basic tenet of capitalism by saying this could be possible, anybody know which one? Would it be too difficult to maintain a level playing field among distributors and companies?
-------------------- "I love him like a brother. David Greenglass." -- Woody Allen - Crimes & Misdemeanors Posts: 1313 | From: NYC | Registered: Jun 1999
| IP: Logged |
posted
Maybe there's someone new (or old) out there who might have someting to add--so BUMP!
Posts: 453 | From: Oakland, CA USA | Registered: Nov 1999
| IP: Logged |
posted
Having just discovered this thread (been out of touch for quite awhile), I'd like to interject a few notes. In addition to being a publisher (Caliber) for a decade or so, I was also a comic book retailer for about 18 years, starting in the early 1980's.
Since this is an old board with little activity, I'll just throw in a few mentions as it may be a dead issue.
I agree that Carol Kalish's death changed the industry. I know Gary Groth's contention was that she sold shit and I don't disagree with that but she did a lot on the business side of things (and of course, it was so we could sell more of the shit but it was beneficial overall). I had many in depth conversations with her and her contention was titles like the Civil War, Dinosaurs, and even Barbie was what the market needed. And of course, all the Marvel books but I always felt that she knew it was the currency of the time so it had to be played. Maybe she was being pushed out at Marvel but I think she had enough clout that she would've continued with someone else. I really do think she would've made an impact.
I dealt with Bob Hellems when I first started and he was a great help...a much more hands on approach was available then. Bob was the local (Detroit)warehouse for Russ Ernst's Glenwood Distributors. I'm not sure if they were the first to do a trade show but it was the first I went to (in Las Vegas). I was also with Capital City for quite awhile but they had the archaic strategy at that time of having a local retailer man the warehouse and of course, the retailer happened to be my competition. (wondered why I never got all those copies of Dark Knight). But Capital grew fast and to me, was the best distributor. I can't fault Diamond as a publisher or a retailer though and they were always immensely fair.
The suggestion that retailers don't need distributors is laughable and I don't mean that as an insult to the person that suggested it. But when Marvel bought Heroes World and Diamond gobbled up some exclusives and Capital City was hanging on...the major complaint from most retailers that I heard was that they had to fill out three forms...and how much of a hassle it was. of course, the entire discount structure is what crippled stores but the bitch sessions were mainly for the hassles of three forms. And publishers want the distributors as well. Try collecting from 1,000 stores on product you sold to them.
There's lots more to be said but if the board is dead...well, the board is dead.
quote:Originally posted by Gary Reed: ...the major complaint from most retailers that I heard was that they had to fill out three forms...and how much of a hassle it was.
This is an interesting statement, and one that I've heard from many retailers. That seems as an almost shot in the foot move by retailers not to take the time to fill out three forms because it would surely (don't call me Shirley) seem that more competition would treat you better. And to complain about three forms always seemed to me to be a way of saying, "I don't want to be Bill Gates unless it's easy."
Of course now there is such a hold of the cojones by Diamond that it would be like a climb up Mt. Everest in the dead of winter to start up a distrubtion company; and yet I would imagine there are those out there that would certainly enjoy the struggle .
-------------------- "Part of me suspects that I’m a loser, and the other part of me thinks I’m God Almighty.” Posts: 2795 | From: Milky Way | Registered: Jul 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
Do you think that the issue of filling out 3 forms would still exist today, or would the potential of easy online electronic ordering mitigate this ?
Posts: 1 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Magilla1973: Do you think that the issue of filling out 3 forms would still exist today, or would the potential of easy online electronic ordering mitigate this ?
To a certain extent, sure, today's easier ordering technologies might make things more palatable to retailers.
But also, it's really not just the order form that these retailers are really complaining about. They're really complaining about the difficulty of being organized enough to manage multiple suppliers. So it's not just that they have to sit down and fill out order forms for Supplier A and Supplier B and Supplier C. It's also that they have to come up with a way to decide which products to order from Supplier A and from Supplier B and from Supplier C. And that they have to be able to remember (or easily look up) which product came (or, if misdelivered, should have come) from which supplier. And balance multiple suppliers' credit and freight policies. And so on, and so on, and so on.
Mind you, many good comics retailers happily do all those things and would, could, and do manage multiple supply chains. But for those who won't, can't, or don't--well--any complaints about the hassles of multiple order forms might just scratch the surface of their reluctance.
-------------------- "[T]hough goodness without knowledge is weak and feeble, yet knowledge without goodness is dangerous, and that both united form the noblest character, and lay the surest foundation of usefulness to mankind." --John Phillips Posts: 1169 | From: New York, NY | Registered: May 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
I do think that the dynamics of the entire market has changed and of course, so has the ordering capabilities especially with all the different computer options available.
Ordering from multiple vendors is far easier now and I think most of the retailers currently in business have already branched out in that direction and deal directly with many different manufacturers...whether it be toys, manga, or whatever. Even though I'm no longer a retailer and haven't been for a couple years now, generally I'd think that surviving retailers are much more business like and savvy than before. With UPC and spreadsheets, retailers can easily track sales and determine best ordering sources and profit ratios. Unfortunately, most don't have the opportunity to do so on much of their product line.
As for a new distributor coming into the fold, I would think its highly unlikely. Diamond having exclusive arrangments negates the revenue stream from those large suppliers so unless new publishers (or new product lines) pop up, a distributor just can't pull in enough dollars. FM International and Cold Cut have small niches established and I just can't see anyone putting a lot of money into a distribution company just to fight those two for that small market viability.
One possible source of new "publishing" is if some of the publishers utilize a tradtional publishing house for thier graphic novel lines in order to gain a stronger foothold in bookstore distribution. I'll use Image as an example simply because they're my current publisher on some titles. If they signed a deal with Random House for example to distribute to package graphic novels, even though the material is the same that is available to Diamond exclusive in comic format, that would be a different publisher on the trades, hence the exclusivity wouldn't apply. Maybe? I don't know...I would think so as the exclusivity is tied up to Image releases not the properties themselves.
But then again, I don't think Marvel and DC are tied up with Diamond for their bookstore distribution so perhaps that avenue is already accounted for.
When I was a publisher (and as a retailer), I never had a serious problem with Diamond and in fact, they were great to work with but I still feel that the whole situation bottlenecked the industry. When the distributor wars started, I think it had a serious impact on many retailers but I don't know if that is the case any more. I think a lack of growth in readership is the primary problem now...and for that, I don't know if anyone has a viable solution.
quote:Originally posted by Gary Reed: But then again, I don't think Marvel and DC are tied up with Diamond for their bookstore distribution so perhaps that avenue is already accounted for.
Actually, Marvel has been exclusive with Diamond's bookstore distribution arm for about a year now (although DC is not).
Posts: 4618 | Registered: Jul 1999
| IP: Logged |
quote: Actually, Marvel has been exclusive with Diamond's bookstore distribution arm for about a year now (although DC is not).
That's surprising. You think that Marvel with its Hollywood success could've arranged something on a more larger scale.
I don't know how Hollywood success has anything to do with bookstore distribution; book publishing and distribution operate on a scale largely beneath the film industry's notice.
That said, before switching their book distribution to Diamond Book Distributors, Marvel had previously used CDS Books, one of the major players in book distribution; I'm sure Marvel was reasonably dilligent in investigating all their options for book trade distribution, and there's no reason to think that the arrangement they have from Diamond isn't the best one for them.
-------------------- "[T]hough goodness without knowledge is weak and feeble, yet knowledge without goodness is dangerous, and that both united form the noblest character, and lay the surest foundation of usefulness to mankind." --John Phillips Posts: 1169 | From: New York, NY | Registered: May 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
I don't think there's anything small-scale about the way that Diamond distributes Marvel. They get the books on the shelves, for sure.
Diamond may not be the biggest book distrbutor out there, but that means that Marvel gets to be the 300 pound gorilla in the relationship. And in terms of warehousing and the like, there are advantages to having one distributor for both the DM and the bookstore market.
Posts: 4618 | Registered: Jul 1999
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well, I'm not a retailer, I'm a librarian. But as a librarian I do have to order a lot of books. We emphatically do need distributors to serve as middlemen. Trying to order everything straight from the publishers would be a nightmare! If you're a small outfit with only a single person doing most of the ordering, as we are, it makes sense to deal with only a limited number of middlemen. We order the great majority of our books from one distributor.
Unlike the DM, libraries still have several major distributors to choose from. From what I've seen, though, Diamond seems pretty benign as monopolies go.
Posts: 1489 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote: I don't know how Hollywood success has anything to do with bookstore distribution; book publishing and distribution operate on a scale largely beneath the film industry's notice.
I disagree. I think Marvel's success would motivate book buyers into looking hard at Marvel sales. And don't diminish the book market as far as marketing and sales strategies for film companies...it is a vital component. Hell, most of the "plans" for exposure for films (if they're suitable) includes comics. Now, that's something that woudl be beneath their notice yet they do notice.
quote: I don't think there's anything small-scale about the way that Diamond distributes Marvel. They get the books on the shelves, for sure.
Diamond may not be the biggest book distrbutor out there, but that means that Marvel gets to be the 300 pound gorilla in the relationship. And in terms of warehousing and the like, there are advantages to having one distributor for both the DM and the bookstore market.
Well, since none of know the details, it just seems to me that Marvel could've gotten a larger partner for bookstore distribution. Yes, with Diamond, Marvel may be the 300 pound gorilla but that's irrelevant. The relevent point is whether Diamond is a 300 pound gorilla in the book distribtuion market. I wouldn't think they are.
Getting books on the shelves is one thing...the return polices, the rate of discount, the advertising allowances, the display allowances, the shrinkage markdowns, the frontal allowances, are all other factors that the larger gorillas tend to get.
But maybe Marvel decided that having a single supplier for all areas serves them best. And having a distributor that "understands" the product is a vital consideration, of course.
You would think, and hope, that Marvel took everything into making their decision.
quote:Originally posted by Gary Reed: Yes, with Diamond, Marvel may be the 300 pound gorilla but that's irrelevant.
I'm not sure why you'd think that being a 300 pound gorilla is irrelevant. It seems to me that there is much advantage in opportunity and responsiveness when your business partner needs you more than you need them. I know I'd certainly rather be a 300 pound gorilla with my distributor than the 2.5 pound gorilla that I am...
Posts: 4618 | Registered: Jul 1999
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Gary Reed: Yes, with Diamond, Marvel may be the 300 pound gorilla but that's irrelevant.
I'm not sure why you'd think that being a 300 pound gorilla is irrelevant. It seems to me that there is much advantage in opportunity and responsiveness when your business partner needs you more than you need them. I know I'd certainly rather be a 300 pound gorilla with my distributor than the 2.5 pound gorilla that I am...
I think what Gary Reed is saying (correct me if I'm wrong) is more along the lines of: In the book distribution market, Diamond is a 2.5 pound gorilla. Why didn't Marvel use a 300 pounder like Random House, Simon & Schuster, etc?
Only Marvel knows that answer. They may have tried and not gotten as good terms as with Diamond, where Marvel is the 300 pound gorilla. They may have decided that having one company handle both markets was best. They may have just taken the path of least resistance- "We know diamond, let's just use Diamond."
The really important question is: Is Diamond working the book store system to push Marvel's products, or are they just filling orders?
"While we were there, we took some pictures of the native girls, but they're not developed yet, so we're going back next spring"-Groucho Marx Posts: 21 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
All I know is that Marvel's share of the bookstore shelves devoted to comics is small and if anything getting smaller. I was in three different chain bookstores the other day, and at least 80% of the space devoted to comics was manga. Marvel shared the rest with DC, everybody else American, and non-comics books about comics. They did at least have the biggest share of that small space. Sort of like what they have in the DM....
Posts: 1489 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Not From Around Here: All I know is that Marvel's share of the bookstore shelves devoted to comics is small and if anything getting smaller. I was in three different chain bookstores the other day, and at least 80% of the space devoted to comics was manga. Marvel shared the rest with DC, everybody else American, and non-comics books about comics. They did at least have the biggest share of that small space. Sort of like what they have in the DM....
Honestly, I'd say that's more a reflection of the current marketplace (certainly the chain bookstore subsection of the marketplace) more than it is of the skill of any particular book trade distributor.
-------------------- "[T]hough goodness without knowledge is weak and feeble, yet knowledge without goodness is dangerous, and that both united form the noblest character, and lay the surest foundation of usefulness to mankind." --John Phillips Posts: 1169 | From: New York, NY | Registered: May 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
There are lots of things that one can do to get books on shelves... but none of them are going to trump shipping the books that readers are buying.
Posts: 4618 | Registered: Jul 1999
| IP: Logged |